From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
To: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bridge: Remove unnecessary vlan_put_tag in br_handle_vlan
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:22:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DFE253.80003@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390350577-4122-1-git-send-email-makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On 01/21/2014 07:29 PM, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> br_handle_vlan() pushes HW accelerated vlan tag into skbuff when outgoing
> port is the bridge device.
> This is unnecessary because __netif_receive_skb_core() can handle skbs
> with HW accelerated vlan tag. In current implementation,
> __netif_receive_skb_core() needs to extract the vlan tag embedded in skb
> data. This could cause low network performance especially when receiving
> frames at a high frame rate on the bridge device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
-vlad
> ---
> net/bridge/br_vlan.c | 21 ---------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> index 7ffc801..4ca4d0a 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
> @@ -151,27 +151,6 @@ struct sk_buff *br_handle_vlan(struct net_bridge *br,
> br_vlan_get_tag(skb, &vid);
> if (test_bit(vid, pv->untagged_bitmap))
> skb = br_vlan_untag(skb);
> - else {
> - /* Egress policy says "send tagged". If output device
> - * is the bridge, we need to add the VLAN header
> - * ourselves since we'll be going through the RX path.
> - * Sending to ports puts the frame on the TX path and
> - * we let dev_hard_start_xmit() add the header.
> - */
> - if (skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
> - pv->port_idx == 0) {
> - /* vlan_put_tag expects skb->data to point to
> - * mac header.
> - */
> - skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN);
> - skb = __vlan_put_tag(skb, skb->vlan_proto, skb->vlan_tci);
> - if (!skb)
> - goto out;
> - /* put skb->data back to where it was */
> - skb_pull(skb, ETH_HLEN);
> - skb->vlan_tci = 0;
> - }
> - }
>
> out:
> return skb;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-22 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-22 0:29 [PATCH net-next] bridge: Remove unnecessary vlan_put_tag in br_handle_vlan Toshiaki Makita
2014-01-22 15:22 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2014-01-23 5:30 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52DFE253.80003@redhat.com \
--to=vyasevic@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).