From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
<ian.campbell@citrix.com>, <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <jonathan.davies@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] xen/grant-table: Avoid m2p_override during mapping
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:05:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E113AE.5060405@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6736948-c67e-4509-89a8-42ec9693830f@email.android.com>
On 20/01/14 21:22, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com> wrote:
>> The grant mapping API does m2p_override unnecessarily: only gntdev
>> needs it,
>> for blkback and future netback patches it just cause a lock contention,
>> as
>> those pages never go to userspace. Therefore this series does the
>> following:
>> - the original functions were renamed to __gnttab_[un]map_refs, with a
>> new
>> parameter m2p_override
>> - based on m2p_override either they follow the original behaviour, or
>> just set
>> the private flag and call set_phys_to_machine
>> - gnttab_[un]map_refs are now a wrapper to call __gnttab_[un]map_refs
>> with
>> m2p_override false
>> - a new function gnttab_[un]map_refs_userspace provides the old
>> behaviour
>
> You don't say anything about the 'return ret' changed to 'return 0'.
>
> Any particular reason for that?
That's the only possible return value there, so it just makes it more
obvious. I'll add a description about that.
Zoli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-23 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-20 18:58 [PATCH v3] xen/grant-table: Avoid m2p_override during mapping Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-20 21:22 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-01-23 13:05 ` Zoltan Kiss [this message]
2014-01-21 12:26 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-01-21 13:40 ` David Vrabel
2014-01-21 14:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-01-21 19:43 ` Zoltan Kiss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E113AE.5060405@citrix.com \
--to=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jonathan.davies@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).