From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <jonathan.davies@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] xen/grant-table: Avoid m2p_override during mapping
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:12:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E13149.1070705@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401231355340.15917@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
On 23/01/14 13:59, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
>>>>>> index 2ae8699..0060178 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
>>>>>> @@ -872,15 +872,13 @@ static unsigned long mfn_hash(unsigned long mfn)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /* Add an MFN override for a particular page */
>>>>>> int m2p_add_override(unsigned long mfn, struct page *page,
>>>>>> - struct gnttab_map_grant_ref *kmap_op)
>>>>>> + struct gnttab_map_grant_ref *kmap_op, unsigned long
>>>>>> pfn)
>>>>>
>>>>> Do we really need to add another additional parameter to
>>>>> m2p_add_override?
>>>>> I would just let m2p_add_override and m2p_remove_override call
>>>>> page_to_pfn again. It is not that expensive.
>>>> Yes, because that page_to_pfn can return something different. That's why
>>>> the
>>>> v2 patches failed.
>>>
>>> I am really curious: how can page_to_pfn return something different?
>>> I don't think is supposed to happen.
>> You call set_phys_to_machine before calling m2p* functions.
>
> set_phys_to_machine changes the physical to machine mapping, that would
> be the mfn corresponding to a given pfn. It shouldn't affect the output
> of page_to_pfn that returns the pfn corresponding to a given struct
> page. The calculation of which is based on address offsets and should be
> static and unaffected by things like set_phys_to_machine.
Indeed, my mistake. The mfn is the only thing which changes, it still
has to be passed to m2p_remove_override. I'll send in a next version
Zoli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-23 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-21 20:22 [PATCH v4] xen/grant-table: Avoid m2p_override during mapping Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-22 10:58 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-01-22 16:39 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-01-22 18:36 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-22 18:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-01-22 19:03 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-23 13:59 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-01-23 15:12 ` Zoltan Kiss [this message]
2014-01-23 15:14 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E13149.1070705@citrix.com \
--to=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jonathan.davies@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).