From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
To: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: Use do_div to divide 64 bit numbers
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 22:18:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E18720.4060008@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52E17F40.4040004@redhat.com>
On 01/23/2014 09:44 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 01/23/2014 07:47 PM, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>> Nikolay Aleksandrov's recent bonding option API changes (25a9b54a and e4994612)
>> introduced u64 as the type of downdelay and updelay. On 32 bit the division and
>> modulo operations cause compile errors:
>>
>> ERROR: "__udivdi3" [drivers/net/bonding/bonding.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: "__umoddi3" [drivers/net/bonding/bonding.ko] undefined!
>>
>> This patch use the do_div macro, which guaranteed to do the right thing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
>> index 4cee04a..4f94907 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>> #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
>> #include <linux/ctype.h>
>> #include <linux/inet.h>
>> +#include <asm/div64.h>
>> #include "bonding.h"
>>
>> static struct bond_opt_value bond_mode_tbl[] = {
>> @@ -727,19 +728,20 @@ int bond_option_miimon_set(struct bonding *bond, struct bond_opt_value *newval)
>>
>> int bond_option_updelay_set(struct bonding *bond, struct bond_opt_value *newval)
>> {
>> + u64 quotient = newval->value;
>> + u64 remainder = do_div(quotient, bond->params.miimon);
> Hi Zoltan,
> Thanks for fixing this, a few comments though:
> bond->params.miimon can be 0 here that's why there's a check afterwards,
> also please separate the local variable definitions from the body with a
> new line.
> The same applies for downdelay.
>
> Nik
In fact since we don't need the u64 and newval->value is limited to
INT_MAX, can't we simply cast it to (int) and avoid the do_div entirely ?
>> if (!bond->params.miimon) {
>> pr_err("%s: Unable to set up delay as MII monitoring is disabled\n",
>> bond->dev->name);
>> return -EPERM;
>> }
>> - if ((newval->value % bond->params.miimon) != 0) {
>> + if (remainder != 0) {
>> pr_warn("%s: Warning: up delay (%llu) is not a multiple of miimon (%d), updelay rounded to %llu ms\n",
>> bond->dev->name, newval->value,
>> bond->params.miimon,
>> - (newval->value / bond->params.miimon) *
>> - bond->params.miimon);
>> + quotient * bond->params.miimon);
>> }
>> - bond->params.updelay = newval->value / bond->params.miimon;
>> + bond->params.updelay = quotient;
>> pr_info("%s: Setting up delay to %d.\n",
>> bond->dev->name,
>> bond->params.updelay * bond->params.miimon);
>> @@ -750,19 +752,20 @@ int bond_option_updelay_set(struct bonding *bond, struct bond_opt_value *newval)
>> int bond_option_downdelay_set(struct bonding *bond,
>> struct bond_opt_value *newval)
>> {
>> + u64 quotient = newval->value;
>> + u64 remainder = do_div(quotient, bond->params.miimon);
>> if (!bond->params.miimon) {
>> pr_err("%s: Unable to set down delay as MII monitoring is disabled\n",
>> bond->dev->name);
>> return -EPERM;
>> }
>> - if ((newval->value % bond->params.miimon) != 0) {
>> + if (remainder != 0) {
>> pr_warn("%s: Warning: down delay (%llu) is not a multiple of miimon (%d), delay rounded to %llu ms\n",
>> bond->dev->name, newval->value,
>> bond->params.miimon,
>> - (newval->value / bond->params.miimon) *
>> - bond->params.miimon);
>> + quotient * bond->params.miimon);
>> }
>> - bond->params.downdelay = newval->value / bond->params.miimon;
>> + bond->params.downdelay = quotient;
>> pr_info("%s: Setting down delay to %d.\n",
>> bond->dev->name,
>> bond->params.downdelay * bond->params.miimon);
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-23 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-23 18:47 [PATCH net-next] bonding: Use do_div to divide 64 bit numbers Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-23 20:44 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-01-23 21:18 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2014-01-23 22:43 ` [PATCH net-next] bonding: fix u64 division Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-01-24 0:12 ` David Miller
2014-01-24 18:27 ` [PATCH net-next] bonding: Use do_div to divide 64 bit numbers Zoltan Kiss
2014-01-23 22:25 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E18720.4060008@redhat.com \
--to=nikolay@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vfalico@redhat.com \
--cc=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).