From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [BUG FIXES - 3.10.27] sit: More backports
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:42:57 +0100
Message-ID: <52EA56E1.40507@6wind.com>
References: <20140128205756.074448668@goodmis.org>	<52E8E025.2060803@6wind.com>	<20140129075745.4227a2ed@gandalf.local.home>	<52E9267C.90403@6wind.com>	<20140129154811.27fbaf13@gandalf.local.home>	<52EA1B4B.5080403@6wind.com> <20140130083103.2bc68bad@gandalf.local.home>
Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
	format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
	"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@uudg.org>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Return-path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140130083103.2bc68bad@gandalf.local.home>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Le 30/01/2014 14:31, Steven Rostedt a =E9crit :
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:28:43 +0100
> Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Steve, I think the patch I sent yesterday is the good fix. At the en=
d, it's
>> a backport of Willem's patch. Note that he also ack that patch.
>> The first version you sent (which removes
>> unregister_netdevice_queue(sitn->fb_tunnel_dev, &list)) will introdu=
ce a
>> memory leak when the user destroy a netns.
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> I reverted my patches and applied and tested your patches locally and
> they passed my first line testing. I'm going to have them entered int=
o
> our test suite, after removing our other patches, and see if they sol=
ve
> all the bugs that we were tripping over.
>
> I'll let you know when these are finished.
Thank you for testing.


Regards,
Nicolas