From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DT: net: document Ethernet bindings in one place
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 21:40:16 +0300
Message-ID: <52F13410.8070205@cogentembedded.com>
References: <201401180405.07859.sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> < CAL_Jsq+oa9P=rh+p-dMZyGP8TcmpX7bTnMU0ynLvFxjxFDYbRg@mail.gmail.com> < 52DD98F7.4090202@cogentembedded.com> < CAL_JsqJXbF1-PcPHR2VP+Vi9A1aWizdsG_r3kDvRt3itXDhCGQ@mail.gmail.com> < CAGVrzcb3X3soJNJCE5+YSpQrr+EdycCRFkptPvBCgFg4CbGJ4Q@mail.gmail.com> < CAGVrzcb0dfw1orZzUt5-YkShOg-HNbUYvvo2vfmsZUZXy1Aqfg@mail.gmail.com> < 52DEE465.9000202@cogentembedded.com> <52E988FA.8040807@cogentembedded.com> <20140204172602.01420C4050F@trevor.secretlab.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140204172602.01420C4050F@trevor.secretlab.ca>
Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Hello.

On 02/04/2014 08:26 PM, Grant Likely wrote:

>>>>>>>      I'm afraid that's too late, it has spread very far, so that
>>>>>>> of_get_phy_mode() handles that property, not "phy-connection-type".

>>>>>> Uggg, I guess this is a case of a defacto standard then if the kernel
>>>>>> doesn't even support it.

>>>>> Maybe I forgot to CC you on patch sent to Grant only, I sent a patch a
>>>>> while ago for of_get_phy_mode() to look for both "phy-mode" and
>>>>> "phy-connection-type" since the former has been a Linux invention, but
>>>>> the latter is ePAPR specified.

>>>> Here is a link to the actual patch in question, not sure which tree
>>>> Grant applied it to though:

>>>> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1311.2/00048.html

>>>      It's not the patch mail, it's Grant's "applied" reply, patch is mangled in
>>> this reply, and I couldn't follow the thread. Here's the actual patch mail:

>>> http://marc.info/?l=devicetree&m=138449662807254

>>      Florian, I didn't find this patch in Grant's official tree, so maybe you
>> should ask him where is the patch already?

> Sorry, I accidentally dropped it. It will be in the next merge window.

    Already saw it, thanks. Would that it was in 3.14 instead of course, so 
that I could use "phy-connection-type" in my binding...

> g.

WBR, Sergei