netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qin Chuanyu <qinchuanyu@huawei.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: <jasowang@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Anthony Liguori" <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Klausler <pmk@google.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: 8% performance improved by change tap interact with kernel stack
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:21:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FA23F3.7040404@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390920560.28432.8.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>

On 2014/1/28 22:49, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 16:14 +0800, Qin Chuanyu wrote:
>> according perf test result,I found that there are 5%-8% cpu cost on
>> softirq by use netif_rx_ni called in tun_get_user.
>>
>> so I changed the function which cause skb transmitted more quickly.
>> from
>> 	tun_get_user	->
>> 		 netif_rx_ni(skb);
>> to
>> 	tun_get_user	->
>> 		rcu_read_lock_bh();
>> 		netif_receive_skb(skb);
>> 		rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> No idea why you use rcu here ?
>
>>
>> The test result is as below:
>> 	CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620  @ 2.40GHz
>> 	NIC: intel 82599
>> 	Host OS/Guest OS:suse11sp3
>> 	Qemu-1.6
>> 	netperf udp 512(VM tx)
>> 	test model: VM->host->host
>>
>> 	modified before : 2.00Gbps 461146pps
>> 	modified after  : 2.16Gbps 498782pps
>>
>> 8% performance gained from this change,
>> Is there any problem for this patch ?
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52963/
the problem list above show that:

   Since the cgroup classifier has this check:
     if (softirq_count() != SOFTIRQ_OFFSET))
	   return -1;
   We still fail to classify the frame.

but the source in the recently version has changed as below:
	if (in_serving_softirq()) {
		/* If there is an sk_classid we'll use that. */
		if (!skb->sk)
			return -1;
		classid = skb->sk->sk_classid;
	}

skb is allocated by tun_alloc_skb, so skb->sk is not NULL.
I think the problem is not existed anymore.



      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-11 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-28  8:14 8% performance improved by change tap interact with kernel stack Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-28  8:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-28  9:14   ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-28  9:41     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-28 10:19       ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-28 10:33         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-28 16:58           ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-01-28 17:18             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-29  7:41           ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-29  7:56             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-28 16:56     ` Rick Jones
2014-01-28 14:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-01-29  7:12   ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-02-11 13:21   ` Qin Chuanyu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52FA23F3.7040404@huawei.com \
    --to=qinchuanyu@huawei.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmk@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).