From: Qin Chuanyu <qinchuanyu@huawei.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: <jasowang@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Anthony Liguori" <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Klausler <pmk@google.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: 8% performance improved by change tap interact with kernel stack
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:21:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FA23F3.7040404@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390920560.28432.8.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
On 2014/1/28 22:49, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 16:14 +0800, Qin Chuanyu wrote:
>> according perf test result,I found that there are 5%-8% cpu cost on
>> softirq by use netif_rx_ni called in tun_get_user.
>>
>> so I changed the function which cause skb transmitted more quickly.
>> from
>> tun_get_user ->
>> netif_rx_ni(skb);
>> to
>> tun_get_user ->
>> rcu_read_lock_bh();
>> netif_receive_skb(skb);
>> rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> No idea why you use rcu here ?
>
>>
>> The test result is as below:
>> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
>> NIC: intel 82599
>> Host OS/Guest OS:suse11sp3
>> Qemu-1.6
>> netperf udp 512(VM tx)
>> test model: VM->host->host
>>
>> modified before : 2.00Gbps 461146pps
>> modified after : 2.16Gbps 498782pps
>>
>> 8% performance gained from this change,
>> Is there any problem for this patch ?
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52963/
the problem list above show that:
Since the cgroup classifier has this check:
if (softirq_count() != SOFTIRQ_OFFSET))
return -1;
We still fail to classify the frame.
but the source in the recently version has changed as below:
if (in_serving_softirq()) {
/* If there is an sk_classid we'll use that. */
if (!skb->sk)
return -1;
classid = skb->sk->sk_classid;
}
skb is allocated by tun_alloc_skb, so skb->sk is not NULL.
I think the problem is not existed anymore.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-11 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-28 8:14 8% performance improved by change tap interact with kernel stack Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-28 8:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-28 9:14 ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-28 9:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-28 10:19 ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-28 10:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-28 16:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-01-28 17:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-29 7:41 ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-01-29 7:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-28 16:56 ` Rick Jones
2014-01-28 14:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-01-29 7:12 ` Qin Chuanyu
2014-02-11 13:21 ` Qin Chuanyu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52FA23F3.7040404@huawei.com \
--to=qinchuanyu@huawei.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmk@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).