From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 tip 0/7] 64-bit BPF insn set and tracing filters Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:47:51 -0800 Message-ID: <52FD4B97.9020306@zytor.com> References: <1391649046-4383-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> <52F3670D.5090608@redhat.com> <52FD47F9.2090907@zytor.com> <52FD4AC0.7090502@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Ingo Molnar , "David S. Miller" , Steven Rostedt , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Masami Hiramatsu , Tom Zanussi , Jovi Zhangwei , Eric Dumazet , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Frederic Weisbecker , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Pekka Enberg , Arjan van de Ven , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Borkmann Return-path: In-Reply-To: <52FD4AC0.7090502@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 02/13/2014 02:44 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > > Well, if that would be the case, then seccomp would have had JIT support > long ago. ;-) Right now BPF filters with seccomp are not JIT compiled > for _any_ architecture. > Really, I was under the impression there were. They *should be*, that was an important concept in the development of the seccomp filters. -hpa