From: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: Timeline of IPoIB performance
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:58:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52irw5f5t0.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <434ACC74.3020404@hp.com> (Rick Jones's message of "Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:17:56 -0700")
Rick> Which rev of netperf are you using, and areyou using the
Rick> "confidence intervals" options (-i, -I)? for a long time,
Rick> the linux-unique behaviour of returning the overhead bytes
Rick> for SO_[SND|RCV]BUF and them being 2X what one gives in
Rick> setsockopt() gave netperf some trouble - the socket buffer
Rick> would double in size each iteration on a confidence interval
Rick> run. Later netperf versions (late 2.3, and 2.4.X) have a
Rick> kludge for this.
I believe it's netperf 2.2.
I'm not using any confidence interval stuff. However, the variation
is not between single runs of netperf -- if I do 5 runs of netperf in
a row, I get roughly the same number from each run. For example, I
might see something like
TCP STREAM TEST to 192.168.145.2 : histogram
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.00 3869.82
and then
TCP STREAM TEST to 192.168.145.2 : histogram
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.00 3862.41
for two successive runs. However, if I reboot the system into the
same kernel (ie everything set up exactly the same), the same
invocation of netperf might give
TCP STREAM TEST to 192.168.145.2 : histogram
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.00 4389.20
Rick> Are there large changes in service demand along with the
Rick> large performance changes?
Not sure. How do I have netperf report service demand?
- R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-10 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1128672413.13948.326.camel@localhost>
[not found] ` <52br20lsei.fsf@cisco.com>
2005-10-08 2:25 ` Timeline of IPoIB performance Matt Leininger
2005-10-10 18:23 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-10 20:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2005-10-10 21:03 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-10 20:17 ` Rick Jones
2005-10-10 20:58 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2005-10-10 21:22 ` Rick Jones
2005-10-10 21:26 ` Grant Grundler
2005-10-10 23:30 ` Grant Grundler
2005-10-11 0:51 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-10 23:25 ` Matt Leininger
2005-10-10 23:38 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-10 23:44 ` Matt Leininger
2005-10-10 23:53 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-11 4:03 ` Roland Dreier
[not found] <E1EPIxF-0001Cp-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
2005-10-12 16:53 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-12 18:28 ` Matt Leininger
2005-10-13 1:24 ` Matt Leininger
2005-10-13 1:48 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52irw5f5t0.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rolandd@cisco.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openib-general@openib.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).