Re: [PATCH][v4][0/24] Second InfiniBand merge candidate patch set

Re: [PATCH][v4][0/24] Second InfiniBand merge candidate patch set

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明]

In article <200412192214.KlDxQ7icOmxHYIf0@topspin.com> (at Sun, 19 Dec 2004 22:14:43 -0800), Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com> says:

> The following series of patches is the latest version of the OpenIB
> InfiniBand drivers.  We believe that this version is suitable for
> merging when 2.6.11 opens (or into -mm immediately), although of
> course we are willing to go through as many more iterations as
> required to fix any remaining issues.

Maybe, via the net queue. David?

--yoshfuji

Re: [PATCH][v4][0/24] Second InfiniBand merge candidate patch set

[David S. Miller]

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:38:45 +0900 (JST)
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ^[$B5HF#1QL@^[(B <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> wrote:

> In article <200412192214.KlDxQ7icOmxHYIf0@topspin.com> (at Sun, 19 Dec 2004 22:14:43 -0800), Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com> says:
> 
> > The following series of patches is the latest version of the OpenIB
> > InfiniBand drivers.  We believe that this version is suitable for
> > merging when 2.6.11 opens (or into -mm immediately), although of
> > course we are willing to go through as many more iterations as
> > required to fix any remaining issues.
> 
> Maybe, via the net queue. David?

If Roland can resubmit his patch queue to me with the fixes
folks have recommended to him, I can start merging this stuff
in.

I leave for vacation Wednesday morning (PST time), so if it is
submitted after that I'll get to it at the beginning of the
new year.

Re: [PATCH][v4][0/24] Second InfiniBand merge candidate patch set

[Roland Dreier]

    David> If Roland can resubmit his patch queue to me with the fixes
    David> folks have recommended to him, I can start merging this
    David> stuff in.

Andrew has indicated to me that he has merged the whole InfiniBand
patch into -mm now.

Dave, did you want to handle the entire merge of the whole IB stack,
or just the net/ parts, which are pretty trivial and stand alone,
since AF_INFINIBAND is already defined in the tree?

I'm happy to do whatever it takes to get IB merged as expeditiously as
possible so Dave & Andrew, please let me know what seems easiest and
best to you.

Thanks,
  Roland

Re: [PATCH][v4][0/24] Second InfiniBand merge candidate patch set

[David S. Miller]

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:19:26 -0800
Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com> wrote:

> Dave, did you want to handle the entire merge of the whole IB stack,
> or just the net/ parts, which are pretty trivial and stand alone,
> since AF_INFINIBAND is already defined in the tree?

Send it all over.