From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH][v4][0/24] Second InfiniBand merge candidate patch set Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:19:26 -0800 Message-ID: <52k6r3j8yp.fsf@topspin.com> References: <200412192214.KlDxQ7icOmxHYIf0@topspin.com> <20041220.153845.70996857.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20041227210007.398734cd.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: akpm@osdl.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org, torvalds@osdl.org Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20041227210007.398734cd.davem@davemloft.net> (David S. Miller's message of "Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:00:07 -0800") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: openib-general-bounces@openib.org Errors-To: openib-general-bounces@openib.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David> If Roland can resubmit his patch queue to me with the fixes David> folks have recommended to him, I can start merging this David> stuff in. Andrew has indicated to me that he has merged the whole InfiniBand patch into -mm now. Dave, did you want to handle the entire merge of the whole IB stack, or just the net/ parts, which are pretty trivial and stand alone, since AF_INFINIBAND is already defined in the tree? I'm happy to do whatever it takes to get IB merged as expeditiously as possible so Dave & Andrew, please let me know what seems easiest and best to you. Thanks, Roland