From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH][v5][0/24] Latest IB patch queue Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:24:43 -0800 Message-ID: <52pt0uhupw.fsf@topspin.com> References: <200412272150.IBRnA4AvjendsF8x@topspin.com> <20041227225417.3ac7a0a6.davem@davemloft.net> <52pt0unr0i.fsf@topspin.com> <20041228141710.4daebcfb.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20041228141710.4daebcfb.davem@davemloft.net> (David S. Miller's message of "Tue, 28 Dec 2004 14:17:10 -0800") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: openib-general-bounces@openib.org Errors-To: openib-general-bounces@openib.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David> I believe that you didn't test the sparc64 build of the David> infiniband stuff because arch/sparc64/Kconfig needs to David> explicitly include the infiniband Kconfig since it does not David> use drivers/Kconfig. You didn't send me any such changes. Actually I did test the build (and Tom Duffy at Sun has actually run the drivers on his system), but I forgot to include the required Kconfig change -- I just have it in my local test tree. David> There are a few platforms which also are in this situation. David> I added the sparc64 one to my tree while integrating your David> changes, but the others need to be attended to if you wish David> infiniband to be configurable on them. I think sparc64 is the only such platform where InfiniBand is likely to be of much interest. However I'll check out all of arch/ and send patches to hook up drivers/infiniband/ to the relevant maintainers once IB makes it upstream. Thanks, Roland