From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: macvtap performance regression (bisected) between 3.13 and 3.14-rc1
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:36:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5314D9B2.6050006@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <531447B2.7040008@de.ibm.com>
On 03/03/2014 04:13 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 02/03/14 02:21, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>> On 03/01/2014 02:27 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>> On 03/01/2014 06:15 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>> On 28/02/14 23:14, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>>>> On 02/27/2014 03:52 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>>>> Vlad,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> commit 6acf54f1cf0a6747bac9fea26f34cfc5a9029523
>>>>>> macvtap: Add support of packet capture on macvtap device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> causes a performance regression for iperf traffic between two KVM guests
>>>>>> on my s390 system. Both guests are connected via two macvtaps on the same OSA
>>>>>> network card.
>>>>>> Before that patch I get ~20 Gbit/sec between two guests, afterwards I get
>>>>>> ~4Gbit/sec
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Latency seems to be unchanges (uperf 1byte ping pong).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to ifconfig in the guest, I have ~ 1500 bytes per packet with this
>>>>>> patch and ~ 40000 bytes without. So for some reason this patch causes the
>>>>>> network stack to do segmentation. (the guest kernel stays the same, only host
>>>>>> kernel is changed).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am looking. It shouldn't cause addition segmentations and when I ran
>>>>> netperf on the code I didn't see any difference in the throughput.
>>>>
>>>> Dont know if the different bytes/packets ratio is really the reason or
>>>> just a side effect. As a hint: the underlying network device does not support
>>>> segmentation, but this should not matter for traffic between to guests.
>>>
>>> Could you post 'ethtool -k' output for both lower-level device and the
>>> macvtap device?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -vlad
>>>
>>
>> Ok. I think I see what's happening. Since you turn off offloads on
>> lower device, that's propagated to macvlan device. As a result, when
>> when we call dev_queue_xmit on the vlan->dev, we end up segmenting since
>> lower level says it does support segmentation.
>>
>> One way to fix this is to never disable offloads on macvlan. macvlan
>> will always try to use __dev_queue_xmit() with it's lower device, so any
>> segmentation can happen there.
>
> If you have anything that I should test, let me know.
Hi Christian
Just sent out a patch to fix this. I tried it with namespaces and
kvm guests and it seems to restore performance for me.
Please give it a try.
Thanks
-vlad
>
> Christian
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-03 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-27 20:52 macvtap performance regression (bisected) between 3.13 and 3.14-rc1 Christian Borntraeger
2014-02-28 22:14 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-03-01 11:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-03-01 19:27 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-03-02 1:21 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-03-03 9:13 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-03-03 19:36 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2014-03-03 9:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5314D9B2.6050006@redhat.com \
--to=vyasevic@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).