netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>,
	<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, <jonathan.davies@citrix.com>,
	<wei.liu2@citrix.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next v7 4/9] xen-netback: Introduce TX grant mapping
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:56:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53218EDA.8040904@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394706812.25873.28.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>

On 13/03/14 10:33, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 21:48 +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>> @@ -135,13 +146,31 @@ struct xenvif {
>>  	pending_ring_idx_t pending_cons;
>>  	u16 pending_ring[MAX_PENDING_REQS];
>>  	struct pending_tx_info pending_tx_info[MAX_PENDING_REQS];
>> +	grant_handle_t grant_tx_handle[MAX_PENDING_REQS];
>>  
>>  	/* Coalescing tx requests before copying makes number of grant
>>  	 * copy ops greater or equal to number of slots required. In
>>  	 * worst case a tx request consumes 2 gnttab_copy.
>>  	 */
>>  	struct gnttab_copy tx_copy_ops[2*MAX_PENDING_REQS];
>> -
>> +	struct gnttab_map_grant_ref tx_map_ops[MAX_PENDING_REQS];
>> +	struct gnttab_unmap_grant_ref tx_unmap_ops[MAX_PENDING_REQS];
> 
> I wonder if we should break some of these arrays into separate
> allocations? Wasn't there a problem with sizeof(struct xenvif) at one
> point?

alloc_netdev() falls back to vmalloc() if the kmalloc failed so there's
no need to split these structures.

David

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-13 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-06 21:48 [PATCH net-next v7 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY instead of copy Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 1/9] xen-netback: Use skb->cb for pending_idx Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 2/9] xen-netback: Minor refactoring of netback code Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 3/9] xen-netback: Handle foreign mapped pages on the guest RX path Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 4/9] xen-netback: Introduce TX grant mapping Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 10:17   ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 12:34     ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 10:33   ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 10:56     ` David Vrabel [this message]
2014-03-13 11:02       ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 11:09         ` David Vrabel
2014-03-13 11:13         ` Wei Liu
2014-03-13 13:17     ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 13:56       ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 17:43         ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 5/9] xen-netback: Remove old TX grant copy definitons and fix indentations Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 6/9] xen-netback: Add stat counters for zerocopy Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 7/9] xen-netback: Handle guests with too many frags Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 8/9] xen-netback: Timeout packets in RX path Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 10:39   ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-06 21:48 ` [PATCH net-next v7 9/9] xen-netback: Aggregate TX unmap operations Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-19 21:16   ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-20  9:53     ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-20 10:48     ` Wei Liu
2014-03-20 11:14       ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-20 12:38         ` Wei Liu
2014-03-20 16:11           ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-07 21:05 ` [PATCH net-next v7 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY instead of copy David Miller
2014-03-08 14:37   ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-08 23:57     ` David Miller
2014-03-10 10:15       ` Wei Liu
2014-03-12 15:40       ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-12 18:49         ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-13 10:43         ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 10:08 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-13 18:23   ` Zoltan Kiss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53218EDA.8040904@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=jonathan.davies@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --cc=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).