From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 22:02:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <532B5773.7020700@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <532B3CD7.5050005@cogentembedded.com>
On 20/03/14 20:09, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 03/20/2014 09:01 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
>>> The pm_rumtime work queue is causing the device to be suspended during
>>> initialisation, thus the initialisation may not be able to access
>>> registers
>>> properly. As the code is called from a work queue, it is possible
>>> that this
>>> is not seen from certain configurations/builds due to the asynchronos
>>> nature of the code.
>
>>> Another issue has also been found where the network device registration
>>> calls back into the driver thus causing further pm_runtime calls that
>>> also caused issues with the MDIO bus code.
>
>>> Use pm_runtime_get_sync() and pm_runtime_put() to ensure that the
>>> pm system does not suspend it during the probe() call and remove the
>>> now unnecessary pm_runtime_resume() call.
>
>>> This fixes the external abort that can cause /sbin/init or other such
>>> init processed to die.
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
>>> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>
>>> ---
>>> Cc: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
>>> Cc: laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com
>>> cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>
>>> Note, Laurent this should probably be applied before your
>>> current series as it may require changes to the exit sequence.
>
>> Would you like me to include the patch in that series when I'll send a
>> pull
>> request ?
>
>>> Fixes from v1:
>>> - use pm_runtime_put() over pm_runtime_put_sync() as
>>> we do not need to guaranteed the device has powered
>>> off after probe.
>
>>> Fixed from v2:
>>> - call pm_runtime_put() in error path
Thanks, that looks like another issue that got missed.
I will submit v3
--
Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-20 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-20 17:34 [PATCH v3] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init Ben Dooks
2014-03-20 18:01 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-20 19:09 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-03-20 21:02 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=532B5773.7020700@codethink.co.uk \
--to=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).