netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh_eth: pm_runtime should not need null operations
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:57:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <532C1B13.7000805@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWO-kNdWT_AxzAmCTrx3NerWpTG+auFNZTcL5hsbN+++A@mail.gmail.com>

On 21/03/14 11:30, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
>> The driver has a no-op for the pm_runtime callbacks but
>> the pm_runtime core should correctly ignore drivers without
>> any pm_rumtime callback ops.
>
> The pm_runtime core doesn't ignore non-existing runtime_{suspend,resume}
> callbacks, it turns them into a failure withv -ENOSYS.
> Only non-existing runtime_idle callbacks are ignored.

I've added Rafael Wysocki as he may be able to add better
feedback to this issue.

[snip rpm_susend code block]

I got very confused here. The clock_ops sets dev->pm_domain
which over-rides the use of the dev->driver->pm entry as the
primary pm for the device. The code above the bit you snipped
does a ladder looking for the pm_runtime entry it calls and
would stop at finding dev->pm_domain as so:

from drivers/base/power/runtime.c:
     495         if (dev->pm_domain)
     496                 callback = dev->pm_domain->ops.runtime_suspend;
  ...
     502                 callback = dev->bus->pm->runtime_suspend;
     503         else
     504                 callback = NULL;


So for drivers on shmobile with drivers/sh/pm_runtime.c enabled
we would never call the drivers' entry as the ops that this code
introduces just calls the pm_clk calls and does not send the
events on.

If we send the events on, then we would use pm_generic_runtime_suspend()
to send it. This call treats the lack of runtime_pm driver entry as a
do nothing and return 0 which means in this case the code in sh_eth
is not necessary to have any pm_runtime functions.

This means depending on if we have a pm_domain in the path we get
different treatment of NULL runtime pm ops pointer. I am not sure
how to handle this, as IIRC a number of other drivers for Renesas
currently assume that the NULL case is going to be fine for them.

Changing pm_generic_runtime_suspend() to return ENOSYS would end
up breaking davinci and probably a number of other platforms.

So questions:

- Should rpm_suspend() ignore the lack of pm_runtime operations?
- Do we need to add a generic `ignore pm runtime callback`
- Are any other shmobile drivers similarly affected?

-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-21 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-21 10:15 [PATCH] sh_eth: pm_runtime should not need null operations Ben Dooks
2014-03-21 10:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-03-21 10:57   ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2014-03-28 18:22     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=532C1B13.7000805@codethink.co.uk \
    --to=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).