netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: John Heffner <johnwheffner@gmail.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TCP being hoodwinked into spurious retransmissions by lack of timestamps?
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:53:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <532CB4D0.50403@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABrhC0=hHpZSdE5-dLqysuFn_d_VK7r1jKb0kGZF9hn1+UHjDw@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/03/2014 07:22 PM, John Heffner wrote:
> Running with such a large window scale and no timestamps (PAWS
> protection) is generally not a great idea, but I don't think is part
> of the issue here.
>
> If you look where things really go wrong, the receiver is sending
> anomalous SACK blocks that will trigger the SACK renege handling path.
>   Reneging triggers go-back-n behavior, so we see the spurious
> retransmits from there on.

What triggers go-back-n when SACK is not in use?  I ask because at least 
once I have seen the same sort of thing without SACK enabled on the 
connection.  The total quantity of retransmissions is roughly the same, 
but spread-out - looks like cwnd shrinks considerably and re-grows in 
the no-SACK case.  Not sure I still have that trace though :(

rick jones

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-21 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-04  0:29 TCP being hoodwinked into spurious retransmissions by lack of timestamps? Rick Jones
2014-03-04  3:22 ` John Heffner
2014-03-04 18:50   ` Rick Jones
2014-03-04 19:14     ` John Heffner
2014-03-04 19:33       ` Rick Jones
2014-03-04 20:35         ` Neal Cardwell
2014-03-04 21:56           ` Rick Jones
2014-03-04 22:23           ` Yuchung Cheng
2014-03-04 23:14             ` Rick Jones
2014-03-21 21:53   ` Rick Jones [this message]
2014-03-25 17:39 ` Rick Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=532CB4D0.50403@hp.com \
    --to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=johnwheffner@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).