Re: [PATCH][next] mwifiex: usb: Replace one-element array with flexible-array member

["Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>]

On 8/9/21 16:24, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 2:08 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <gustavoars@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
>> a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
>> should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
>> style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
>>
>> This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable -Warray-bounds
>> and get us closer to being able to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE routines
>> on memcpy().
>>
>> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle and audited and fixed,
>> manually.
>>
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
>> [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.10/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/79
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> 
> An important part of your patch rationale should include determining
> that the 1-length wasn't actually important anywhere. I double checked
> for you, and nobody seemed to be relying on 'sizeof struct fw_data' at
> all, so this should be OK:

I always do that. That's the reason why I included this line in the
changelog text:

"This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle and audited and fixed,
manually."

Thanks for double-checking, though. :)

> Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>

Thanks
--
Gustavo