From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, <edwin@etorok.net>,
<paul.durrant@citrix.com>, <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
<zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net V2] xen-netback: disable rogue vif in kthread context
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:04:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53317ECA.4040406@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395750051-15932-1-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com>
On 25/03/14 12:20, Wei Liu wrote:
> When netback discovers frontend is sending malformed packet it will
> disables the interface which serves that frontend.
>
> However disabling a network interface involving taking a mutex which
> cannot be done in softirq context, so we need to defer this process to
> kthread context.
>
> This patch does the following:
> 1. introduce a flag to indicate the interface is disabled.
> 2. check that flag in TX path, don't do any work if it's true.
> 3. check that flag in RX path, turn off that interface if it's true.
>
> The reason to disable it in RX path is because RX uses kthread. After
> this change the behavior of netback is still consistent -- it won't do
> any TX work for a rogue frontend, and the interface will be eventually
> turned off.
[...]
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c
> @@ -61,12 +61,23 @@ static int xenvif_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> {
> struct xenvif *vif = container_of(napi, struct xenvif, napi);
> int work_done;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + /* This vif is rogue, we pretend we've there is nothing to do
> + * for this vif to deschedule it from NAPI. But this interface
> + * will be turned off in thread context later.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(vif->disabled)) {
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + __napi_complete(napi);
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
Why isn't this napi_complete(napi) (which uses local_irq_save/restore()
internally)?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-25 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-25 12:20 [PATCH net V2] xen-netback: disable rogue vif in kthread context Wei Liu
2014-03-25 13:04 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2014-03-25 13:38 ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2014-03-25 13:40 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-26 20:44 ` David Miller
2014-03-28 18:37 ` David Miller
2014-03-31 10:30 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53317ECA.4040406@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=edwin@etorok.net \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).