netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	<paul.durrant@citrix.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <jonathan.davies@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] Revert "xen-netback: Aggregate TX unmap operations"
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:57:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5332B27E.4040205@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395653207.19365.1.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>

On 24/03/14 09:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 17:23 +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>> This reverts commit e9275f5e2df1b2098a8cc405d87b88b9affd73e6. This commit is the
>> last in the netback grant mapping series, and it tries to do more aggressive
>> aggreagtion of unmap operations. However practical use showed almost no
>> positive effect, whilst with certain frontends it causes significant performance
>> regression.
>
> That's a shame -- do you have any insight into why?

It cause performance regression when the guest limits itself to a small 
amount of outstanding packets. E.g. with iperf on Win7 there are always 
2 in flight.
Currently batching happens in this way:
- the callback can put up to MAX_SKB_FRAGS slots into the dealloc ring 
before it wakes up the dealloc thread
- the thread doesn't schedule immediately, of course, so other callbacks 
can add to the dealloc ring in the meantime
- and even when the dealloc thread consumes the dealloc ring, the 
callbacks can put slots onto it

And my upcoming patch will avoid TLB flush in a lot of cases. If someone 
has more time to research a better strategy, that would be good, but I 
think currently it is a low priority thing.

Zoli

      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-26 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-21 17:23 [PATCH net-next] Revert "xen-netback: Aggregate TX unmap operations" Zoltan Kiss
2014-03-24  9:26 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-25 22:58   ` David Miller
2014-03-26 10:57   ` Zoltan Kiss [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5332B27E.4040205@citrix.com \
    --to=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=jonathan.davies@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).