From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC v2 0/6] introduce infrastructure for support of switch chip datapath Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:32:35 -0400 Message-ID: <53341A63.3000004@mojatatu.com> References: <1395851472-10524-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> <53334A3F.6020105@mojatatu.com> <20140327072107.GC2845@minipsycho.orion> <5333FD12.9060404@mojatatu.com> <20140327110223.GA1615@casper.infradead.org> <533408C0.8000608@mojatatu.com> <20140327120012.GA13573@casper.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jiri Pirko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, andy@greyhouse.net, dborkman@redhat.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com, jesse@nicira.com, pshelar@nicira.com, azhou@nicira.com, ben@decadent.org.uk, stephen@networkplumber.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, vyasevic@redhat.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, john.r.fastabend@intel.com, edumazet@google.com, sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, dev@openvswitch.org To: Thomas Graf Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com ([209.85.223.172]:63858 "EHLO mail-ie0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753926AbaC0Mcn (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:32:43 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id as1so3341379iec.31 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 05:32:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140327120012.GA13573@casper.infradead.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/27/14 08:00, Thomas Graf wrote: > It seems like we reached pretty good consensus on the model. What > remaining issues do you see with the port model proposed in v2? > Are we really following the same thread? I dont see any rallying behind Jiri's approach from the other folks who have their own code and way of approaching things. I am hoping we dont continue with the split that is there already. cheers, jamal