Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/3] ipv6: reuse rt6_need_strict

[Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>]

Hello.

On 28-03-2014 13:20, Wangyufen wrote:

> From: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>

> Move the whole rt6_need_strict as static inline into ip6_route.h,
> so that it can be reused

> Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
> ---
>   include/net/ip6_route.h | 5 +++++
>   net/ipv6/route.c        | 6 ------
>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/include/net/ip6_route.h b/include/net/ip6_route.h
> index 00e3f12..33e8694 100644
> --- a/include/net/ip6_route.h
> +++ b/include/net/ip6_route.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ static inline unsigned int rt6_flags2srcprefs(int flags)
>   	return (flags >> 3) & 7;
>   }
>
> +static inline bool rt6_need_strict(const struct in6_addr *daddr)
> +{
> +	return ipv6_addr_type(daddr) &
> +		IPV6_ADDR_MULTICAST | IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL | IPV6_ADDR_LOOPBACK);

    I don't think removing parens was correct here: & should have more 
priority than |.

> +}
>
>   void ip6_route_input(struct sk_buff *skb);
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index b93ae6a..5015c50 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -374,12 +374,6 @@ static bool rt6_check_expired(const struct rt6_info *rt)
>   	return false;
>   }
>
> -static bool rt6_need_strict(const struct in6_addr *daddr)
> -{
> -	return ipv6_addr_type(daddr) &
> -		(IPV6_ADDR_MULTICAST | IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL | IPV6_ADDR_LOOPBACK);
> -}
> -
>   /* Multipath route selection:
>    *   Hash based function using packet header and flowlabel.
>    * Adapted from fib_info_hashfn()

WBR, Sergei