From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, magnus.damm@opensource.se,
nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] sh_eth: use RNC mode for R8A7790
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 20:13:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5335D7CC.3070100@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5335DDC7.8040400@cogentembedded.com>
On 28/03/14 20:38, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 03/28/2014 07:46 PM, Ben Dooks wrote:
>
>> The current behaviour of the sh_eth driver is not to use the RNC bit
>> for the receive ring. This means that every packet recieved is not only
>> generating an IRQ but it also stops the receive ring DMA as well until
>> the driver re-enables it after unloading the packet.
>
>> This means that a number of the following errors are generated due to
>> the receive packet FIFO overflowing due to nowhere to put packets:
>
>> net eth0: Receive FIFO Overflow
>
>> Setting the RMCR_RNC configuration has so far been tested with an NFS
>> root filesystem and the driver has not failed yet. It is not yet known
>> why this is not set for R8A779x operation
>
> The reason is simple: it's not set on almost all 100 Mbs devices
> except SH7757 (and most recently added R7S72100), so this was a matter
> of copy-paste. I've had setting this bit on at least R-Car devices on my
> aganda for some time but couldn't get to it yet.
>
>> (Feedback on this issue or other testing is welcome)
>
> OK, I'll try it with netperf UDP test known to generate handful of
> the aforementioned errors, when I have time.
I find the best way is to either use NFS-root or turn on all the
locking debugging, it seems to slow things down enough for the
RX FIFO to overflow.
From a quick debug, I saw that each RX IRQ delivered one packet
from the ring buffer before requiring the hardware received to
be re-started.
So far I have not had any chance to make any speed tests, however
it has cleared off a lot of the fifo messages off my nfs-root tests
here. I've had a ring-error, but that was due to another driver
holding interrupts for far too long.
--
Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-28 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-28 16:46 [RFC] sh_eth: use RNC mode for R8A7790 Ben Dooks
2014-03-28 20:38 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-03-28 20:13 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2014-04-14 12:47 ` Ben Dooks
2014-04-14 16:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-04-14 16:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-04-25 23:54 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-04-25 23:55 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5335D7CC.3070100@codethink.co.uk \
--to=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@opensource.se \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).