From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Holler Subject: Re: [PATCH regression] net: phy: fix initialization (config_init) for Marvel 88E1116R PHYs Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:58:16 +0200 Message-ID: <533D8518.1010306@ahsoftware.de> References: <1396396559-6971-1-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> <533BD3CD.1010905@ahsoftware.de> <533C721E.1080004@gmail.com> <533C8B49.8080704@ahsoftware.de> <533C8ECB.4090900@gmail.com> <533D0B09.9040602@ahsoftware.de> <533D207E.9020909@gmail.com> <533D790C.5000104@ahsoftware.de> <533D8207.2050108@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , netdev , Michal Simek , stable To: Sebastian Hesselbarth , Florian Fainelli Return-path: In-Reply-To: <533D8207.2050108@gmail.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Am 03.04.2014 17:45, schrieb Sebastian Hesselbarth: > > I will try to reproduce it and if I hit it, will do a bisect to find > (and fix) the offending patch. > >> I have better ways to waste my time. > > Like writing workarounds instead of fixing bugs? Sure. If I would try to fix (or even describe) every bug in the kernel I already know about, I would never have time to do anything else. Besides that you still try to ignore, that I didn't know at first that it's a workaround at all. Especially after I've discovered that the reset is the place where things are failing. Otherwise I wouldn't have sent the patch (which I know NOW that it just is a workaround). Alexander Holler