From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Dichtel Subject: Re: [patch net-next] net: make packet_type->ak_packet_priv generic Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 16:23:24 +0200 Message-ID: <533EC05C.50902@6wind.com> References: <1396614038-31975-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> <20140404.095420.1460518706334112992.davem@davemloft.net> <20140404140325.GB2892@minipsycho.brq.redhat.com> <20140404.100754.1337061118939924472.davem@davemloft.net> Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, vfalico@redhat.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, hkchu@google.com, dborkman@redhat.com, willemb@google.com, hannes@stressinduktion.org, atzm@stratosphere.co.jp, phil@nwl.cc, richardcochran@gmail.com To: David Miller , jiri@resnulli.us Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:32882 "EHLO mail-wi0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753151AbaDDOX2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2014 10:23:28 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id q5so1379508wiv.16 for ; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 07:23:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140404.100754.1337061118939924472.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 04/04/2014 16:07, David Miller a =E9crit : > From: Jiri Pirko > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 16:03:25 +0200 > >> Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:54:20PM CEST, davem@davemloft.net wrote: >>> From: Jiri Pirko >>> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 14:20:38 +0200 >>> >>>> The priv is used now by af_packet. Rename it to make it useable fo= r >>>> others as well. Also, introduce packet_id_match to move the sk mat= ching >>>> from skb_loop_sk to af_packet code where it belongs. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko >>> >>> Firstly, net-next is closed. >> >> Dave, it would be really great if you stick with the same email subj= ect >> when you declare net-next closed. I was looking for "CLOSED" but now= the >> subject is "no new feature patches please" which I missed. > > Sorry, that's not a reasonable request. > > It is very clear from the subject line I choose what the message is > about. I don't have to use an ALL CAPS subject line "just because" Sure, the subject is very clear. Personally I don't care, but I think t= hat a part of netdev subscribers/submitters don't read every emails. Having a= lways the same prefix (like the one you already used: '[README]') may ease th= ese guys to put some filters to highlight these emails. At the end, this may als= o save you time ;-) My two cents, Nicolas