From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: sctp: test if association is dead in sctp_wake_up_waiters
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 08:55:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5345432B.40100@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de3e98e644dde7dcaea9a952de38eb32a2959eeb.1396999714.git.dborkman@redhat.com>
On 04/08/2014 07:32 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> In function sctp_wake_up_waiters(), we need to involve a test
> if the association is declared dead. If so, we don't have any
> reference to a possible sibling association anymore and need
> to invoke sctp_write_space() instead and normally walk the
> socket's associations and notify them of new wmem space. The
> reason for special casing is that, otherwise, we could run
> into the following issue:
>
> sctp_association_free()
> `-> list_del(&asoc->asocs) <-- poisons list pointer
> asoc->base.dead = true
> sctp_outq_free(&asoc->outqueue)
> `-> __sctp_outq_teardown()
> `-> sctp_chunk_free()
> `-> consume_skb()
> `-> sctp_wfree()
> `-> sctp_wake_up_waiters() <-- dereferences poisoned pointers
> if asoc->ep->sndbuf_policy=0
>
> Therefore, only walk the list in an 'optimized' way if we find
> that the current association is still active. We could also use
> list_del_init() in addition when we call sctp_association_free(),
> but as Vlad suggests, we want to trap such bugs and thus leave
> it poisoned as is. Stress-testing seems fine now.
>
> Fixes: cd253f9f357d ("net: sctp: wake up all assocs if sndbuf policy is per socket")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
-vlad
> ---
> v1->v2:
> - leave list_del()
>
> net/sctp/socket.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index 5f83a6a..270d5bd 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -6604,6 +6604,12 @@ static void sctp_wake_up_waiters(struct sock *sk,
> if (asoc->ep->sndbuf_policy)
> return __sctp_write_space(asoc);
>
> + /* If association goes down and is just flushing its
> + * outq, then just normally notify others.
> + */
> + if (asoc->base.dead)
> + return sctp_write_space(sk);
> +
> /* Accounting for the sndbuf space is per socket, so we
> * need to wake up others, try to be fair and in case of
> * other associations, let them have a go first instead
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-09 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-08 23:32 [PATCH net v2] net: sctp: test if association is dead in sctp_wake_up_waiters Daniel Borkmann
2014-04-09 8:09 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-04-09 10:32 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-04-09 10:59 ` Neil Horman
2014-04-09 13:34 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-04-09 12:56 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-04-09 12:52 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-04-09 12:55 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5345432B.40100@gmail.com \
--to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).