From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nsn.com>,
ext Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song@gmail.com>,
Matija Glavinic Pecotic <matija.glavinic-pecotic.ext@nsn.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] Revert "net: sctp: Fix a_rwnd/rwnd management to reflect real state of the receiver's buffer"
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:05:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <534ED48A.6040502@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <534ED0FD.4040709@gmail.com>
On 04/16/2014 08:50 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 04/16/2014 05:02 AM, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
>> Hi Dongsheng!
>>
>> On 16/04/14 10:39, ext Dongsheng Song wrote:
>>> >From my testing, netperf throughput from 600 Mbit/s drop to 6 Mbit/s,
>>> the penalty is 99 %.
>>
>> The question was, do you see this as a problem of the new rwnd algorithm?
>> If yes, how exactly?
[ Default config ./test_timetolive from lksctp-test suite triggered
that as well actually it appears, i.e. showing that the app never
woke up from the 3 sec timeout. ]
> The algorithm isn't wrong, but the implementation appears to have
> a bug with window update SACKs. The problem is that
> sk->sk_rmem_alloc is updated by the skb destructor when
> skb is freed. This happens after we call sctp_assoc_rwnd_update()
> which tries to send the update SACK. As a result, in default
> config with per-socket accounting, the test
> if ((asoc->base.sk->sk_rcvbuf - rx_count) > 0)
> uses the wrong values for rx_count and results in advertisement
> of decreased rwnd instead of what is really available.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-16 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-14 19:45 [PATCH net] Revert "net: sctp: Fix a_rwnd/rwnd management to reflect real state of the receiver's buffer" Daniel Borkmann
2014-04-14 19:57 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-04-16 6:57 ` Matija Glavinic Pecotic
2014-04-16 8:39 ` Dongsheng Song
2014-04-16 9:02 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2014-04-16 11:55 ` Matija Glavinic Pecotic
2014-04-16 13:32 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-04-16 18:50 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-04-16 19:05 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2014-04-16 19:24 ` Matija Glavinic Pecotic
2014-04-16 19:47 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-04-21 19:12 ` Matija Glavinic Pecotic
2014-04-14 20:48 ` David Miller
2014-04-15 8:46 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2014-04-15 8:57 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-04-15 6:43 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2014-04-15 7:08 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-04-15 14:27 ` Butler, Peter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=534ED48A.6040502@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.sverdlin@nsn.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dongsheng.song@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matija.glavinic-pecotic.ext@nsn.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).