netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nsn.com>,
	ext Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song@gmail.com>,
	Matija Glavinic Pecotic <matija.glavinic-pecotic.ext@nsn.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] Revert "net: sctp: Fix a_rwnd/rwnd management to reflect real state of the receiver's buffer"
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:05:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <534ED48A.6040502@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <534ED0FD.4040709@gmail.com>

On 04/16/2014 08:50 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 04/16/2014 05:02 AM, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
>> Hi Dongsheng!
>>
>> On 16/04/14 10:39, ext Dongsheng Song wrote:
>>> >From my testing, netperf throughput from 600 Mbit/s drop to 6 Mbit/s,
>>> the penalty is 99 %.
>>
>> The question was, do you see this as a problem of the new rwnd algorithm?
>> If yes, how exactly?

[ Default config ./test_timetolive from lksctp-test suite triggered
   that as well actually it appears, i.e. showing that the app never
   woke up from the 3 sec timeout. ]

> The algorithm isn't wrong, but the implementation appears to have
> a bug with window update SACKs.  The problem is that
> sk->sk_rmem_alloc is updated by the skb destructor when
> skb is freed.  This happens after we call sctp_assoc_rwnd_update()
> which tries to send the update SACK.  As a result, in default
> config with per-socket accounting, the test
>      if ((asoc->base.sk->sk_rcvbuf - rx_count) > 0)
> uses the wrong values for rx_count and results in advertisement
> of decreased rwnd instead of what is really available.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-16 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-14 19:45 [PATCH net] Revert "net: sctp: Fix a_rwnd/rwnd management to reflect real state of the receiver's buffer" Daniel Borkmann
2014-04-14 19:57 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-04-16  6:57   ` Matija Glavinic Pecotic
2014-04-16  8:39     ` Dongsheng Song
2014-04-16  9:02       ` Alexander Sverdlin
2014-04-16 11:55         ` Matija Glavinic Pecotic
2014-04-16 13:32           ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-04-16 18:50         ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-04-16 19:05           ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2014-04-16 19:24             ` Matija Glavinic Pecotic
2014-04-16 19:47               ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-04-21 19:12                 ` Matija Glavinic Pecotic
2014-04-14 20:48 ` David Miller
2014-04-15  8:46   ` Alexander Sverdlin
2014-04-15  8:57     ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-04-15  6:43 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2014-04-15  7:08   ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-04-15 14:27   ` Butler, Peter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=534ED48A.6040502@redhat.com \
    --to=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.sverdlin@nsn.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dongsheng.song@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matija.glavinic-pecotic.ext@nsn.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).