From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Fastabend Subject: Re: HHF support in iproute2? Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 08:23:59 -0700 Message-ID: <5362670F.2080400@gmail.com> References: <4420ec641916f42ac8bb9becc634a8cf@visp.net.lb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Denys Fedoryshchenko , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: stephen@networkplumber.org Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180]:53531 "EHLO mail-ob0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751833AbaEAPYT (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2014 11:24:19 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id va2so1077534obc.39 for ; Thu, 01 May 2014 08:24:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4420ec641916f42ac8bb9becc634a8cf@visp.net.lb> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/11/2014 09:11 PM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > Hi > > I just tried recently last iproute2 (git and release) and noticed in > iproute-3.14.0 it is still missing HHF support, while i see it is > accepted in git > (http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=138933793006411&w=2) > Is there any problem with this scheduling discipline? > > Thanks! Hi Stephen, I can't seem to find this patch either. I checked the repository at git.kernel.org and it looks like q_hhf.c is missing. Was this intentional? Or am I just missing something. I have the patch applied locally and it seems to work OK. Thanks, John -- John Fastabend Intel Corporation