From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Robert Olsson <robert@herjulf.se>,
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>,
danieltt@kth.se, zhouzhouyi@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/5] ixgbe: increase default TX ring buffer to 1024
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 09:28:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537399C2.8070908@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140514141748.20309.83121.stgit@dragon>
On 05/14/2014 07:17 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Using pktgen I'm seeing the ixgbe driver "push-back", due TX ring
> running full. Thus, the TX ring is artificially limiting pktgen.
>
> Diagnose via "ethtool -S", look for "tx_restart_queue" or "tx_busy"
> counters.
>
> Increasing the TX ring buffer should be done carefully, as it comes at
> a higher memory cost, which can also negatively influence performance.
> E.g. ring buffer array of struct ixgbe_tx_buffer (current size 48bytes)
> increase from 512*48=24576bytes to 1024*48=49152bytes which is larger
> than the L1 data cache (32KB on my E5-2630), thus increasing the L1->L2
> cache-references.
>
> Adjusting the TX ring buffer (TXSZ) measured over 10 sec with ifpps
> (single CPU performance, ixgbe 10Gbit/s, E5-2630)
> * cmd: ethtool -G eth8 tx $TXSZ
> * 3,930,065 pps -- TXSZ= 512
> * 5,312,249 pps -- TXSZ= 768
> * 5,362,722 pps -- TXSZ=1024
> * 5,361,390 pps -- TXSZ=1536
> * 5,362,439 pps -- TXSZ=2048
> * 5,359,744 pps -- TXSZ=4096
>
> Choosing size 1024 because for the next optimizations 768 is not
> enough.
>
> Notice after commit 6f25cd47d (pktgen: fix xmit test for BQL enabled
> devices) pktgen uses netif_xmit_frozen_or_drv_stopped() and ignores
> the BQL "stack" pause (QUEUE_STATE_STACK_XOFF) flag. This allow us to put
> more pressure on the TX ring buffers.
>
> It is the ixgbe_maybe_stop_tx() call that stops the transmits, and
> pktgen respecting this in the call to netif_xmit_frozen_or_drv_stopped(txq).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h
> index c688c8a..bf078fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>
> /* TX/RX descriptor defines */
> -#define IXGBE_DEFAULT_TXD 512
> +#define IXGBE_DEFAULT_TXD 1024
> #define IXGBE_DEFAULT_TX_WORK 256
> #define IXGBE_MAX_TXD 4096
> #define IXGBE_MIN_TXD 64
>
What is the point of optimizing ixgbe for a synthetic benchmark? In my
experience the full stack can only handle about 2Mpps at 60B packets
with a single queue. Updating the defaults for a pktgen test seems
unrealistic as that isn't really a standard use case for the driver.
I'd say that it might be better to just add a note to the documentation
folder indicating what configuration is optimal for pktgen rather then
changing everyone's defaults to support one specific test.
Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-14 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-14 14:17 [net-next PATCH 0/5] Optimizing "pktgen" for single CPU performance Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 14:17 ` [net-next PATCH 1/5] ixgbe: trivial fixes while reading code Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 14:17 ` [net-next PATCH 2/5] ixgbe: increase default TX ring buffer to 1024 Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 14:28 ` David Laight
2014-05-14 19:25 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 16:28 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2014-05-14 17:49 ` David Miller
2014-05-14 19:09 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 19:54 ` David Miller
2014-05-15 9:16 ` David Laight
2014-05-29 15:29 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 14:17 ` [net-next PATCH 3/5] pktgen: avoid atomic_inc per packet in xmit loop Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 14:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-05-14 15:13 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 15:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-05-14 14:17 ` [net-next PATCH 4/5] pktgen: avoid expensive set_current_state() call in loop Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-05-14 14:18 ` [net-next PATCH 5/5] pktgen: RCU'ify "if_list" to remove lock in next_to_run() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-06-26 11:16 ` [net-next PATCH V2 0/3] Optimizing pktgen for single CPU performance Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-06-26 11:16 ` [net-next PATCH V2 1/3] pktgen: document tuning for max NIC performance Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-06-26 11:16 ` [net-next PATCH V2 2/3] pktgen: avoid expensive set_current_state() call in loop Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-06-26 11:16 ` [net-next PATCH V2 3/3] pktgen: RCU-ify "if_list" to remove lock in next_to_run() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-07-01 22:51 ` [net-next PATCH V2 0/3] Optimizing pktgen for single CPU performance David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537399C2.8070908@intel.com \
--to=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=danieltt@kth.se \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=robert@herjulf.se \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=zhouzhouyi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).