netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>,
	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"gospo@redhat.com" <gospo@redhat.com>,
	"sassmann@redhat.com" <sassmann@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 01/11] ixgbe: fix detection of SFP+ capable interfaces
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 22:16:29 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5373B2FD.5060505@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87618083B2453E4A8714035B62D679924FF672BE@FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com>

Hello.

On 05/14/2014 08:59 PM, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:

>>> From: Emil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>

>>> In cases where the driver is loaded while there are no SFP+ modules in
>>> the cage the interface was not being detected as SFP capable. To account
>>> for this the driver called identify_sfp in ixgbe_get_settings to make
>>> sure the data is correct. However when there is no SFP+ module in the cage
>>> the driver waits for the I2C reads to time out which can take more than a
>>> second and will cause issues with tools (like net-snmp) that may poll
>>> for that information.

>>> This patch resolves the issue by identifying 82599 based NIC with no PHY
>>> type set as SFP capable which allows the driver to detect the SFP module
>>> when the interface is brought up. As result of this we can also remove the
>>> identify_sfp call from ixgbe_get_settings.

>>> Signed-off-by: Emil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>
>>> Tested-by: Phil Schmitt <phillip.j.schmitt@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>

>> [...]

>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>>> index 8089ea9..e44c42a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>>> @@ -4660,6 +4660,10 @@ static inline bool ixgbe_is_sfp(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
>>>    	case ixgbe_phy_nl:
>>>    		if (hw->mac.type == ixgbe_mac_82598EB)
>>>    			return true;
>>> +	/* ixgbe_phy_none is set when no SFP module is present */
>>> +	case ixgbe_phy_none:
>>> +		if (hw->mac.type == ixgbe_mac_82599EB)
>>> +			return true;

>>     Shouldn't it just be combined with the previous case?

> How can you combine them? The previous case is for ixgbe_phy_nl and 82598 macs this patch is for ixgbe_phy_none and 82599.

    Ah, sorry, I've misread 82598EB as 82599EB.

> Thanks,
> Emil

WBR, Sergei

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-14 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-14  8:54 [net-next 00/11][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates Jeff Kirsher
2014-05-14  8:54 ` [net-next 01/11] ixgbe: fix detection of SFP+ capable interfaces Jeff Kirsher
2014-05-14 12:26   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-05-14 16:59     ` Tantilov, Emil S
2014-05-14 18:16       ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2014-05-14 18:22         ` Tantilov, Emil S
2014-05-14 19:00           ` David Miller
2014-05-14  8:54 ` [net-next 02/11] ixgbe: clean up checkpatch warnings about CODE_INDENT and LEADING_SPACE Jeff Kirsher
2014-05-14 16:25   ` Joe Perches
2014-05-14 20:48     ` Keller, Jacob E
2014-05-14  8:54 ` [net-next 03/11] ixgbe: fix function-like macro, remove semicolon Jeff Kirsher
2014-05-14  8:54 ` [net-next 04/11] ixgbe: fix checkpatch style of blank line after declaration Jeff Kirsher
2014-05-14  8:54 ` [net-next 05/11] ixgbe: fix several concatenated strings to single line Jeff Kirsher
2014-05-14  8:54 ` [net-next 06/11] ixgbe: add braces around else block Jeff Kirsher
2014-05-14  8:54 ` [net-next 07/11] ixgbe: don't check NULL for debugfs_remove_recursive Jeff Kirsher
2014-05-14  8:54 ` [net-next 08/11] ixgbe: add space between operands to & Jeff Kirsher
2014-05-14  8:54 ` [net-next 09/11] ixgbe: add /* fallthrough */ comment to case statements Jeff Kirsher
2014-05-14  8:54 ` [net-next 10/11] igb/ixgbe: remove return statements for void functions Jeff Kirsher
2014-05-14  8:54 ` [net-next 11/11] i40e,igb,ixgbe: remove usless return statements Jeff Kirsher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5373B2FD.5060505@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
    --cc=gospo@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).