netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Revert 462fb2af9788a82a534f8184abfde31574e1cfa0 (bridge : Sanitize skb before it enters the IP stack)
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 13:27:32 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <537AD2AC.4050009@davidnewall.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140519170915.GB24523@breakpoint.cc>

On 20/05/14 02:39, Florian Westphal wrote:
>  From a quick glance, it should be sufficient to edit
> br_parse_ip_options() and remove everything after
>
> memset(IPCB(skb), 0, sizeof(struct inet_skb_parm));

Yes.  That's the way it used to be, and how it would return with the 
change I'm proposing.  The br_parse_ip_option function would be removed 
and its remaining code moved back from whence it came.


> A 2nd step would be to move a copy of ip_options_compile()
> into br_netfilter.c and trim it down to only validate the
> ipv4 header without modifying it.

The bridge sounds like the wrong place to validate an IPv4 header, 
unless it also validates every type of header; and that can't be right.  
That we need to zero the cb area seems like a big clue that IP's 
treatment of the area is lame.  I think that's where the problem lies, 
and that the right thing to do is to yank out the crap from bridge that 
papers over IP's weakness.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-05-20  3:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-11 14:41 Bad checksum on bridge with IP options David Newall
2014-05-11 19:42 ` Lukas Tribus
2014-05-12  8:14   ` David Newall
2014-05-12 10:15     ` Lukas Tribus
2014-05-12 10:25       ` David Newall
2014-05-12 10:31         ` Lukas Tribus
2014-05-12 10:48           ` David Newall
2014-05-12 13:23 ` David Newall
2014-05-12 13:51   ` Florian Westphal
2014-05-12 14:19     ` David Newall
2014-05-12 18:54   ` Lukas Tribus
2014-05-12 23:46     ` David Newall
2014-05-14 13:08       ` David Newall
2014-05-16 14:33         ` Revert 462fb2af9788a82a534f8184abfde31574e1cfa0 (bridge : Sanitize skb before it enters the IP stack) David Newall
2014-05-16 15:19           ` Eric Dumazet
2014-05-16 15:23             ` David Newall
2014-05-16 15:24             ` David Newall
2014-05-19 12:58           ` David Newall
2014-05-19 14:01             ` Florian Westphal
2014-05-19 14:19               ` David Newall
2014-05-19 17:09                 ` Florian Westphal
2014-05-19 20:49                   ` Bart De Schuymer
2014-05-21  7:49                     ` David Newall
2014-05-21 18:51                       ` Bart De Schuymer
2014-05-21 20:18                         ` David Miller
2014-05-22 18:57                           ` Bart De Schuymer
2014-05-24 18:00                             ` David Miller
2014-05-24  5:56                           ` David Newall
2014-05-24 17:43                             ` David Miller
2014-05-25  2:32                               ` David Newall
2014-05-25  3:02                                 ` David Miller
2014-05-25  6:37                                   ` David Newall
2014-05-27  8:55                                 ` David Laight
2014-05-29 22:34                                 ` David Miller
2014-05-30  9:17                                   ` David Newall
2014-05-31  0:46                                     ` David Miller
2014-05-31  6:13                                       ` David Newall
2014-05-31  6:37                                         ` David Miller
2014-05-22  3:50                         ` David Newall
2014-05-22 18:57                           ` Bart De Schuymer
2014-05-20  3:57                   ` David Newall [this message]
2014-05-20  4:55                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-05-20 16:05                   ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-05-21  8:10                   ` David Newall
2014-05-21 20:14                     ` David Miller
2014-05-22 20:06           ` Bandan Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=537AD2AC.4050009@davidnewall.com \
    --to=davidn@davidnewall.com \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).