From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: What's the right way to use a *large* number of source addresses? Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:30:39 -0400 Message-ID: <5380E54F.4030906@mojatatu.com> References: <6zlhtsvnqp.fsf@southpole.se> <53808957.7020906@mojatatu.com> <5380B729.5080101@mojatatu.com> <5380C28F.2050508@nod.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: =?UTF-8?B?TmllbHMgTcO2bGxlcg==?= , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Jonas Bonn To: Richard Weinberger Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com ([209.85.223.179]:52887 "EHLO mail-ie0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751133AbaEXSan (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2014 14:30:43 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id rd18so6370350iec.10 for ; Sat, 24 May 2014 11:30:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5380C28F.2050508@nod.at> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/24/14 12:02, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Digging through the code shows that this feature is rather new. > I had the old nat functionality of the routing subsystem in mind. > This was the replacement for that. It is at least as old as a grade one kid. cheers, jamal