From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SCTP seems to lose its socket state.
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 16:18:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538644AE.90807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1724E53D@AcuExch.aculab.com>
On 05/27/2014 11:10 AM, David Laight wrote:
> I've been looking at an ethernet trace from one of our customers.
> They seem to have got an SCTP socket into a rather confused state.
>
> There seem to be a significant number of transmit ethernet frames
> that don't read the far end.
> This shouldn't cause a real problem, but we end up with the following:
> This trace was taken on the linux system:
>
> 39964 0.304473 -> SCTP INIT
> 39965 0.292669 <- SCTP INIT (I think this has an invalid checksum)
> 39968 0.467935 <- SCTP INIT
> 39969 0.000093 -> SCTP INIT_ACK
> 39970 0.003947 <- SCTP COOKIE_ECHO
> 39971 0.000072 -> SCTP COOKIE_ACK
> 39972 0.000337 -> M3UA ASPUP
> 39979 0.809659 <- SCTP COOKIE_ECHO
cookie_ack was dropped for some reason?
> 39980 0.000058 -> SCTP COOKIE_ACK
> shutdown() called here - seems to be ignored
> 39983 0.949471 <- SCTP COOKIE_ECHO
Cookie timer fired and resent the cookie_echo.
> 39984 0.000053 -> SCTP COOKIE_ACK
> 39986 0.730072 -> M3UA ASPUP Same TSN as above
> 40002 0.270589 -> M3UA ASPUP Same TSN as above
Hmm.. look like more retransmissions.
> 40008 3.689088 <- SCTP HEARTBEAT
This probably means that cookie_ack was finally accepted and
we are not heart-beating...
output of 'cat /proc/net/sctp/assocs' might help. If the local
is running a recent enough kernel, then turning on dynamic debug
in sctp will also help.
> 40009 0.000027 -> SCTP HEARTBEAT_ACK
> 40014 0.261152 <- SCTP HEARTBEAT
> 40015 0.000033 -> SCTP HEARTBEAT_ACK
> 40026 0.123048 <- SCTP HEARTBEAT
> 40027 0.000030 -> SCTP HEARTBEAT_ACK
> 40036 1.615048 -> M3UA ASPUP Same TSN as above
>
> There are no signs of any SACKs for the ASPUP, I think they have the
> correct TSN (the same value as in the INIT_ACK).
Make sure that verification tags match what was negotiated in
init/init_ack, and the SSN starts at 0.
> No signs of any shutdowns or aborts from either system.
>
What's strange is that some frames are simply not accepted.
Are the nics by any chance ixgbe that has checksum offload and
the checksums are corrupt for some reason?
-vlad
> As seems to be typical for M3UA the source and destination ports are
> the same. No additional IP addresses appear in the INIT (etc) messages.
>
> Some 80 seconds after the start of the above the remote sends us another INIT.
> This is responded to (with new verification tags from both ends), but only
> SCTP heartbeats get sent/received (both ways).
>
> The remote sends a few heartbeats with the old verification tag they are
> ignored.
>
> The application is repeatedly trying to connect() - but the requests fail
> immediately (errno unknown).
> I think the system is RHEL 6.4, kernel: 2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64.
>
> Does this 'ring any bells' ?
> I think I've asked a similar question before - and 2.6.32 was thought
> to be a late enough kernel.
> It is, of course, possible they are running RHEL 5 on this system.
>
> I can't think of an easy way to repeat the above sequence to verify
> on a much more recent kernel.
>
> David
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-27 15:10 SCTP seems to lose its socket state David Laight
2014-05-28 20:18 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2014-05-29 9:03 ` David Laight
2014-05-29 9:12 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-06-06 15:14 ` David Laight
2014-06-06 16:24 ` David Laight
2014-06-06 16:50 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-06-09 12:49 ` David Laight
2014-06-09 18:37 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-06-10 8:29 ` David Laight
2014-06-09 22:44 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-06-13 10:53 ` David Laight
2014-06-13 18:48 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-06-16 8:40 ` David Laight
2014-06-16 13:47 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-06-16 14:46 ` David Laight
2014-06-17 11:28 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538644AE.90807@gmail.com \
--to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).