From: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
jasowang@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com, vfalico@gmail.com,
edumazet@google.com, vyasevic@redhat.com, hkchu@google.com,
xemul@parallels.com, therbert@google.com,
bhutchings@solarflare.com, xii@google.com,
stephen@networkplumber.org, jiri@resnulli.us,
sergei shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] tuntap: reduce the size of tun_struct by using flex array.
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 02:40:14 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538874253.4658840.1416987614805.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141125.132717.122094133335261929.davem@davemloft.net>
>
> From: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:04:04 +0530
>
> > This patch switches to flex array to implement the flow caches, it brings
> > several advantages:
> >
> > - Reduce the size of the tun_struct structure, which allows us to increase
> > the
> > upper limit of queues in future.
> > - Avoid higher order memory allocation. It will be useful when switching to
> > pure hashing in flow cache which may demand a larger size array in
> > future.
> >
> > After this patch, the size of tun_struct on x86_64 reduced from 8512 to
> > 328
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: David Gibson <dgibson@redhat.com>
>
> I see no reason to use flex arrays for this, you are preallocaing the
> memory so if anything flex array is adding an unnecessary level of
> redirection for every access in return for no real gains.
>
> Just allocate the thing normally using kzalloc() or whatever.
I agree. Will do the changes and submit v3.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-26 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-24 18:34 [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] tuntap: reduce the size of tun_struct by using flex array Pankaj Gupta
2014-11-24 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/3] " Pankaj Gupta
2014-11-25 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] " David Miller
2014-11-26 7:40 ` Pankaj Gupta [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538874253.4658840.1416987614805.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=pagupta@redhat.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dgibson@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkchu@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
--cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
--cc=xii@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).