From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] split BPF out of core networking
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:35:39 +0200
Message-ID: <538E319B.3000606@redhat.com>
References: <1401692506-7796-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> <538C3C94.3080206@redhat.com> <CAMEtUuzkjZCsReWH9cZs8AU0mJjZH9YOdCBTWusxe6-NZ9mQ=g@mail.gmail.com> <538CAEA6.4060307@redhat.com> <CAMEtUuwxJOgYgFjg9deQZOffeg6-JUGZXZ1Rj344eQmriQ0F0Q@mail.gmail.com> <538D8DAA.7090105@redhat.com> <CAMEtUuw8uyCGeLeUB0PXm5cCpqcsjPLZt6y9FcKjapbVPjWTuw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Chema Gonzalez <chema@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMEtUuw8uyCGeLeUB0PXm5cCpqcsjPLZt6y9FcKjapbVPjWTuw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On 06/03/2014 05:44 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
...
> All of your points are valid. They are right questions to ask. I just
> don't see why you're still arguing about first step of filter.c split,
> whereas your concerns are about steps 2, 3, 4.

Fair enough, lets keep them in mind though for future work. Btw,
are other files planned for kernel/bpf/ or should it instead just
simply be kernel/bpf.c?