From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
To: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
<linux-kernel@codethink.co.uk>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com>, <magnus.damm@opensource.se>,
<horms@verge.net.au>, <cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v3] sh_eth: use RNC mode for packet reception
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 09:29:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538E685A.1000505@renesas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401794473-30050-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Hi Ben,
(2014/06/03 20:21), Ben Dooks wrote:
> The current behaviour of the sh_eth driver is not to use the RNC bit
> for the receive ring. This means that every packet recieved is not only
> generating an IRQ but it also stops the receive ring DMA as well until
> the driver re-enables it after unloading the packet.
>
> This means that a number of the following errors are generated due to
> the receive packet FIFO overflowing due to nowhere to put packets:
>
> net eth0: Receive FIFO Overflow
>
> Since feedback from Yoshihiro Shimoda shows that every supported LSI
> for this driver should have the bit enabled it seems the best way is
> to remove the RMCR default value from the per-system data and just
> write it when initialising the RMCR value. This is discussed in
> the message (http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg284912.html).
>
> I have tested the RMCR_RNC configuration with NFS root filesystem and
> the driver has not failed yet. There are further test reports from
> Sergei Shtylov and others for both the R8A7790 and R8A7791.
>
> There is also feedback fron Cao Minh Hiep[1] which reports the
> same issue in (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/316285)
> showing this fixes issues with losing UDP datagrams under iperf.
>
> Tested-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Thank you very much for the patch.
Acked-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-04 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-03 11:21 [RFC/PATCH v3] sh_eth: use RNC mode for packet reception Ben Dooks
2014-06-04 0:29 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda [this message]
2014-06-04 1:26 ` Simon Horman
2014-06-04 2:29 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538E685A.1000505@renesas.com \
--to=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=magnus.damm@opensource.se \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).