netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] net: remove some useless list_del()
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:26:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538ED82E.7070407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQK+JUp63oETwazjkmouyQqn8ph9Ssbe=B6qhChcHgcgrw@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/04/2014 04:18 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 17:11 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> "list_kill" is allocated on stack and it's a list head,
>>> it is pointless to call list_del(&kill_list) especially
>>> after unregister_netdevice_many().
>>
>> How pointless exactly ? Explain more please.
>>
>> I suggest you read various commits adding these list_del()
>>
>> f87e6f47933e3ebeced9bb12615e830a72cedce4 is a good start.
>
> Interesting thread. Thanks guys!
> detailed explanation by Linus:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/17/267

Indeed, thanks for the pointer. On that note, if you grep for
unregister_netdevice_many() invocations, you'll see many more
such cases that would need a list_del() actually.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-04  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-04  0:11 [Patch net-next] net: remove some unless free on failure in alloc_netdev_mqs() Cong Wang
2014-06-04  0:11 ` [Patch net-next] net: remove some useless list_del() Cong Wang
2014-06-04  0:24   ` David Miller
2014-06-04  0:43   ` Eric Dumazet
2014-06-04  2:18     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-06-04  8:26       ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2014-06-06  6:40     ` Cong Wang
2014-06-06 13:17       ` Eric Dumazet
2014-06-06 13:44         ` [PATCH net-next] net: force a list_del() in unregister_netdevice_many() Eric Dumazet
2014-06-06 15:54           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-06-08 21:15           ` David Miller
2014-06-09  1:27           ` Gao feng
2014-06-09  5:48             ` Eric Dumazet
2014-06-09  5:58         ` [Patch net-next] net: remove some useless list_del() Cong Wang
2014-06-04  2:19 ` [Patch net-next] net: remove some unless free on failure in alloc_netdev_mqs() David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=538ED82E.7070407@redhat.com \
    --to=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).