From: annie li <annie.li@oracle.com>
To: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux@eikelenboom.it,
paul.durrant@citrix.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net] xen-netback: Fix handling of skbs requiring too many slots
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 11:59:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538F4271.7080505@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538F3E6A.7000002@citrix.com>
On 2014/6/4 11:42, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> On 04/06/14 16:09, annie li wrote:
>>
>> On 2014/6/3 16:30, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>>> A recent commit (a02eb4 "xen-netback: worse-case estimate in
>>> xenvif_rx_action is
>>> underestimating") capped the slot estimation to MAX_SKB_FRAGS, but
>>> that triggers
>>> the next BUG_ON a few lines down, as the packet consumes more slots
>>> than
>>> estimated.
>>> This patch introduces full_coalesce on the skb callback buffer, which
>>> is used in
>>> start_new_rx_buffer() to decide whether netback needs coalescing more
>>> aggresively. By doing that, no packet should need more than
>>> XEN_NETIF_MAX_TX_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE data slots,
>>
>> (XEN_NETIF_MAX_TX_SIZE+1) / PAGE_SIZE here?
>
> Do you think about the GSO slot? That's why I wrote "data slot",
> however that's probably not a clear terminology.
What I mean is: XEN_NETIF_MAX_TX_SIZE is 0xFFFF, and
XEN_NETIF_MAX_TX_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE turns out to be 15 slots when
PAGE_SIZE is 4096. You was trying to use XEN_NETIF_MAX_TX_SIZE as max
size of packet - 64k?
> I'll add then that excluding GSO slot, as it doesn't carry data
> directly, therefore it's irrelevant from this point of view.
Correct.:-)
Thanks
Annie
>
> Zoli
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-04 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-03 20:30 [PATCH net] xen-netback: Fix handling of skbs requiring too many slots Zoltan Kiss
2014-06-04 8:50 ` David Laight
2014-06-04 10:15 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-06-04 15:53 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-06-04 15:09 ` annie li
2014-06-04 15:42 ` [Xen-devel] " Zoltan Kiss
2014-06-04 15:59 ` annie li [this message]
2014-06-11 12:36 ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-06-11 19:17 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538F4271.7080505@oracle.com \
--to=annie.li@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).