From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vlad Yasevich Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 4/5] net: sctp: improve sctp_select_active_and_retran_path selection Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:51:37 -0400 Message-ID: <53987B09.30904@gmail.com> References: <1402499003-29355-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> <1402499003-29355-5-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> <539873E2.3020003@gmail.com> <539874E3.2010607@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Borkmann Return-path: Received: from mail-qc0-f172.google.com ([209.85.216.172]:52505 "EHLO mail-qc0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755583AbaFKPvl (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:51:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <539874E3.2010607@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/11/2014 11:25 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 06/11/2014 05:21 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote: >> On 06/11/2014 11:03 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: >>> In case we neither found a possible ACTIVE or UNKNOWN trans_pri >>> resp. trans_sec from our current transport list, we currently >> ^^^^^^ >> >> Not sure what you wanted to say here. > > Actually just the case of trans_pri == NULL, trans_sec == NULL > since they weren't updated when traversing the list, sorry if > this was unclear. The "resp." seemed like either an abbreviation or an incomplete word. In either case, it should be clarified. -vlad