From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 4/5] net: sctp: improve sctp_select_active_and_retran_path selection Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:52:38 +0200 Message-ID: <53987B46.3040504@redhat.com> References: <1402499003-29355-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> <1402499003-29355-5-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> <539873E2.3020003@gmail.com> <539874E3.2010607@redhat.com> <53987B09.30904@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org To: Vlad Yasevich Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14741 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752163AbaFKPwn (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:52:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <53987B09.30904@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/11/2014 05:51 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote: > On 06/11/2014 11:25 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: >> On 06/11/2014 05:21 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote: >>> On 06/11/2014 11:03 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: >>>> In case we neither found a possible ACTIVE or UNKNOWN trans_pri >>>> resp. trans_sec from our current transport list, we currently >>> ^^^^^^ >>> >>> Not sure what you wanted to say here. >> >> Actually just the case of trans_pri == NULL, trans_sec == NULL >> since they weren't updated when traversing the list, sorry if >> this was unclear. > > The "resp." seemed like either an abbreviation or an incomplete > word. In either case, it should be clarified. Ok, sure, will reword it.