From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>,
nhorman@tuxdriver.com, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sctp: Fix sk_ack_backlog wrap-around problem
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:29:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5399B95A.9080804@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402541616-15117-1-git-send-email-xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>
On 06/11/2014 10:53 PM, Xufeng Zhang wrote:
> Consider the scenario:
> For a TCP-style socket, while processing the COOKIE_ECHO chunk in
> sctp_sf_do_5_1D_ce(), after it has passed a series of sanity check,
> a new association would be created in sctp_unpack_cookie(), but afterwards,
> some processing maybe failed, and sctp_association_free() will be called to
> free the previously allocated association, in sctp_association_free(),
> sk_ack_backlog value is decremented for this socket, since the initial
> value for sk_ack_backlog is 0, after the decrement, it will be 65535,
> a wrap-around problem happens, and if we want to establish new associations
> afterward in the same socket, ABORT would be triggered since sctp deem the
> accept queue as full.
> Fix this issue by only decrementing sk_ack_backlog for associations in
> the endpoint's list.
>
> Fix-suggested-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xufeng Zhang <xufeng.zhang@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Thanks
-vlad
> ---
> Change for v2:
> Drop the redundant test for temp suggested by Vlad Yasevich.
>
> net/sctp/associola.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
> index 39579c3..0b99998 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/associola.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ void sctp_association_free(struct sctp_association *asoc)
> /* Only real associations count against the endpoint, so
> * don't bother for if this is a temporary association.
> */
> - if (!asoc->temp) {
> + if (!list_empty(&asoc->asocs)) {
> list_del(&asoc->asocs);
>
> /* Decrement the backlog value for a TCP-style listening
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-12 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-12 2:53 [PATCH v2] sctp: Fix sk_ack_backlog wrap-around problem Xufeng Zhang
2014-06-12 8:04 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-06-12 14:29 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2014-06-12 17:38 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5399B95A.9080804@gmail.com \
--to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=xufeng.zhang@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).