From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SCTP data chunk bundling when SCTP_NODELAY is set
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:45:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A062A9.70806@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1725DD38@AcuExch.aculab.com>
On 06/17/2014 10:17 AM, David Laight wrote:
> If SCTP_NODELAY is set it is difficult to get SCTP to bundle
> data chunks into ethernet packets.
> This leads to very high packet rates which bundling could easily
> reduce by a factor or 8 or 10.
>
> Nagle can't really be enabled because it generates unwanted delays
> when traffic is light (Nagle only really works for unidirectional bulk
> data and command-response when the messages are smaller than the mtu).
>
> Even if the sending application knows it has more data to send,
> there isn't much it can do to get the chunks bundled.
>
> AFAICT 'corking' the socket even stops full sized packets being
> sent - so the application will deadlock if the socket write
> buffer size is reached before the socket is 'uncorked'.
> This also means that the application can't send back to back
> full sized packets unless it uncorks the socket at exactly
> the right places.
>
> MSG_MORE isn't supported by SCTP, but I'm not sure it would help.
> You really need a MSG_NO_MORE flag and to leave Nagle enabled.
>
> About the only thing I can think of is to normally have Nagle
> enabled, and then perform the following sequence to force the
> buffered data chunks be sent:
> 1) disable Nagle
> 2) cork the socket
> 3) uncork the socket
> 4) enable Nagle
> Four socket calls is a little excessive!
First, how are you corking an SCTP socket? There is no SCTP_CORK
and looking at the code, I don't see how an SCTP queue can be
cored by user...
I suppose we could implement SCTP_CORK to do the right thing.
I thought is possibly utilizing something like sendmmsg() and passing
an extra flag to let it be know that this is a multi-message send
that should be queued up by sctp..
-vlad
>
> Any other ideas ?
>
> David
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-17 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-17 14:17 SCTP data chunk bundling when SCTP_NODELAY is set David Laight
2014-06-17 15:45 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2014-06-17 16:07 ` David Laight
2014-06-17 16:49 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-06-18 13:47 ` David Laight
2014-06-18 16:38 ` David Laight
2014-06-19 13:27 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-06-19 13:45 ` David Laight
2014-06-19 14:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-06-19 15:36 ` Vlad Yasevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A062A9.70806@gmail.com \
--to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).