From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markos Chandras Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] Misc MIPS/BPF fixes for 3.16 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:12:10 +0100 Message-ID: <53AA845A.1070505@imgtec.com> References: <1403516340-22997-1-git-send-email-markos.chandras@imgtec.com> <20140623.124919.2215480222213445820.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.59.15.196]:42354 "EHLO mailapp01.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755033AbaFYIMO (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 04:12:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140623.124919.2215480222213445820.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/23/2014 08:49 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Markos Chandras > Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:38:43 +0100 > >> Here are some fixes for MIPS/BPF for 3.16. These fixes make >> the bpf testsuite *almost* happy with only 2 tests (LD_IND_LL, >> LD_IND_NET) failing at the moment. Since fixing the remaining tests >> is not so trivial, it would be nice to have these fixes in 3.16 for now. >> >> The patches are based on the upstream-sfr/mips-for-linux-next tree >> because they depend on https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/7099/ > > You did not CC: netdev on patches 1, 2, and 3. Please do not do this, > people on this list will want to review the series as a whole. > Apologies David. Patches 1,2,3 have nothing to do with bpf-jit and they only fix/add MIPS micro-assembler instructions so I didn't though netdev@ actually cared about that. I will be more careful in the future. -- markos