netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amir Vadai <amirv.mellanox@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
	Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@mellanox.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
	amira@mellanox.com, Yuval Atias <yuvala@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V1 1/3] net/mlx4_en: Don't use irq_affinity_notifier to track changes in IRQ affinity map
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:43:35 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B13F57.5060901@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404119512.15139.70.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>

On 6/30/2014 12:11 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 11:34 +0300, Amir Vadai wrote:
> 
>> TX completions are very quick compared to the skb preparation and
>> sending. Which is not the case for RX completions. Because of that, it
>> is very easy to reproduce the problem in RX flows, but we never had any
>> report of that problem in the TX flow.
> 
> This is because reporters probably use same number of RX and TX queues.
> 
> With TCP Small queues, TX completions are not always quick, if thousands
> of flows are active.
> 
> Some people hit the locked cpu when say one cpu has to drain 8 TX
> queues, because 7 other cpus can continuously feed more packets 
> 
>> I prefer not to spend time on the TX, since we plan to send a patch soon
>> to use the same NAPI for both TX and RX.
> 
> Thanks, this sounds great.
> 
> 

Ok, so unless anyone objects, the plan is to continue with this patch
(RX only). If the unified NAPI patch will be delayed I will send the TX
fix too.

Amir

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-30 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-29  8:54 [PATCH net V1 0/3] Mellanox EN driver fixes 2014-06-23 Amir Vadai
2014-06-29  8:54 ` [PATCH net V1 1/3] net/mlx4_en: Don't use irq_affinity_notifier to track changes in IRQ affinity map Amir Vadai
2014-06-30  6:41   ` Eric Dumazet
2014-06-30  8:34     ` Amir Vadai
2014-06-30  9:11       ` Eric Dumazet
2014-06-30 10:43         ` Amir Vadai [this message]
2014-07-01  3:33       ` David Miller
2014-07-01  9:14         ` Amir Vadai
2014-06-29  8:54 ` [PATCH net V1 2/3] lib/cpumask: cpumask_set_cpu_local_first to use all cores when numa node is not defined Amir Vadai
2014-06-29  8:54 ` [PATCH net V1 3/3] net/mlx4_en: IRQ affinity hint is not cleared on port down Amir Vadai
2014-07-03  1:29 ` [PATCH net V1 0/3] Mellanox EN driver fixes 2014-06-23 David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53B13F57.5060901@gmail.com \
    --to=amirv.mellanox@gmail.com \
    --cc=amira@mellanox.com \
    --cc=amirv@mellanox.com \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yevgenyp@mellanox.com \
    --cc=yuvala@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).