From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] SCTP updates
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 18:10:40 +0200
Message-ID: <53BD6980.1090605@redhat.com>
References: <1404507908-6949-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> <20140708111408.GA23026@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <53BBFAA6.80408@redhat.com> <20140708144127.GB23026@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <53BD1211.4080504@redhat.com> <20140709104958.GA3784@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <53BD4363.70306@redhat.com> <20140709151354.GA5250@localhost.localdomain> <53BD6167.1030000@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>, davem@davemloft.net,
	geirola@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51550 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750951AbaGIQKv (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:10:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <53BD6167.1030000@gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On 07/09/2014 05:36 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
...
> The problem here is deprecation of ancillary data and that's is a lot tougher
> then socket options.  In this particular case (SCTP_SNDRCVINFO vs SCTP_RCVINFO),
> I don't think there is any way to deprecate the SCTP_SNDRCVINFO since the event
> enabling it is the same as the one for SCTP_RCVINFO.  This was a mistake in the
> spec.  Ancillary data should not have been enabled using even notification api,
> as it is not an event, but we now have to live with it.

Then the set could stay as is from my side.