netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: sctp: inherit auth_capable on INIT collisions
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:59:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C998DE.2030805@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53C972BE.5090700@redhat.com>

On 07/18/2014 03:17 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 07/18/2014 04:38 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> ...
>> Why is the original value of asoc->peer.auth_capable = 0?
>> In case of collision, asoc is the old association that
>> existed on the system.  That association was created as part of
>> sending the INIT.  If it is processing a duplicate COOKIE-ECHO
>> as you say, then it has already processed the INIT-ACK and
>> should have determined that the peer is auth capable.
>>
>> Thus the capability of the new and the old associations should
>> be same if we are in fact processing case B (collision).
>>
>> If not, then something else if wrong and my guess is that all
>> other capabilities would be wrong too.
> 
> I agree that they might likely also be flawed.
> 
> Ok, let me dig further.

So I think I know why case D ends up not authenticating the COOKIE-ACK.
Most likely the reason is the following statement:
 repl = sctp_make_cookie_ack(new_asoc, chunk);

Note that we use new_asoc, instead of current asoc.

Not sure why case B is dumping core yet.

-vlad

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-18 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-17 18:05 [PATCH net] net: sctp: inherit auth_capable on INIT collisions Daniel Borkmann
2014-07-18 12:35 ` Neil Horman
2014-07-18 14:38 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-07-18 19:17   ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-07-18 21:59     ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2014-07-18 22:13       ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-07-18 23:03         ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-07-19  2:23           ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-07-20  9:13             ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-07-18 23:23       ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-07-22 13:25       ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-07-22 16:41         ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-07-22 16:43           ` Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53C998DE.2030805@gmail.com \
    --to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).