netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, cwang@twopensource.com
Cc: amirv@mellanox.com, edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	ogerlitz@mellanox.com, yevgenyp@mellanox.com, idos@mellanox.com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V1 1/2] net: Header length compution function
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:08:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D6D7FE.6070908@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140728.154211.834824360197491109.davem@davemloft.net>

On 07/28/2014 03:42 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:26:08 -0700
> 
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Alexander Duyck
>> <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> wrote:
>>> On 07/28/2014 04:28 AM, Amir Vadai wrote:
>>>> +u32 eth_frame_headlen(void *data, unsigned int len)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     const struct ethhdr *eth = data;
>>>> +     struct sk_buff skb;
>>>> +
>>>> +     if (unlikely(len < ETH_HLEN))
>>>> +             return len;
>>>> +
>>>> +     skb.protocol = eth->h_proto;
>>>> +     skb.head = data + ETH_HLEN;
>>>> +     skb.data = skb.head;
>>>> +     skb_reset_network_header(&skb);
>>>> +     skb.len = len - ETH_HLEN;
>>>> +     skb.data_len = 0;
>>>> +     return __skb_get_poff(&skb) + ETH_HLEN;
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> I'm still not a big fan of allocating an sk_buff on the stack.  Seems
>>> like it isn't maintainable and really opens things up to possible issues
>>> if someone ever extends the __skb_get_poff call.  But I'm not going to
>>> force the issue since for now this isn't impacting igb or ixgbe.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I think you can refactor the code to pass all these input as
>> arguments instead of a whole skbuff.
> 
> I was going to say the same thing, but if you take a look it's not so
> simple.
> 
> The code currently handles fragmented SKBs just fine, and you'd
> therefore have to make a seperate code path for purely linear buffers,
> and thus code duplication.
> 
> I'm still not sure what's better, to be honest.  Currently I'm leaning
> towards allowing the version in this patch set, even though it's a bit
> risky this is in the fast path so perhaps warrants such tricks for
> performance's sake.
> 

I think if anything it might be nice to add some warnings to
__skb_get_poff, and skb_flow_dissect pointing back to this code in order
to warn someone thinking of optimizing it so that they are aware that
there is a caller that provides partially initialized and incomplete SKBs.

Thanks,

Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-28 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-28 11:27 [PATCH net-next V1 0/2] Helper to find length of headers in an ethernet frame Amir Vadai
2014-07-28 11:28 ` [PATCH net-next V1 1/2] net: Header length compution function Amir Vadai
2014-07-28 14:50   ` Alexander Duyck
2014-07-28 21:26     ` Cong Wang
2014-07-28 22:42       ` David Miller
2014-07-28 23:08         ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2014-07-28 11:28 ` [PATCH net-next V1 2/2] net/mlx4_en: Copy exact header to SKB linear part Amir Vadai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53D6D7FE.6070908@intel.com \
    --to=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=amirv@mellanox.com \
    --cc=cwang@twopensource.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=idos@mellanox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
    --cc=yevgenyp@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).