From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net] xen-netback: make sure that hashes are not send to unaware frontends
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 07:49:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53e1696c79a447c3929267dc3de7dc82@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161007.013801.2201234350691558646.davem@davemloft.net>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net]
> Sent: 07 October 2016 06:38
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wei Liu
> <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] xen-netback: make sure that hashes are not send
> to unaware frontends
>
> From: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 15:47:10 +0100
>
> > In the case when a frontend only negotiates a single queue with xen-
> > netback it is possible for a skbuff with a s/w hash to result in a
> > hash extra_info segment being sent to the frontend even when no hash
> > algorithm has been configured. (The ndo_select_queue() entry point
> > makes sure the hash is not set if no algorithm is configured, but this
> > entry point is not called when there is only a single queue). This can
> > result in a frontend that isunable to handle extra_info segments being
> > given such a segment, causing it to crash.
> >
> > This patch fixes the problem by gating whether the extra_info is sent
> > not only on the presence of a s/w hash, but also on whether the hash
> > algorithm has been configured.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
>
> This doesn't apply cleanly to the current 'net' tree, please respin.
>
Sure. V2 coming.
Paul
> Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-07 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-06 14:47 [PATCH net] xen-netback: make sure that hashes are not send to unaware frontends Paul Durrant
2016-10-07 5:38 ` David Miller
2016-10-07 7:49 ` Paul Durrant [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53e1696c79a447c3929267dc3de7dc82@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net \
--to=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).