netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@nvidia.com>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <jiri@resnulli.us>, <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	<andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com>, <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
	<guglielmo.morandin@broadcom.com>, <eugenem@fb.com>,
	<eranbe@mellanox.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 2/3] devlink: health: add remediation type
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:32:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53f182d0-e1f6-5e18-ac04-ff7f6ec56af8@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210311032613.1533100-2-kuba@kernel.org>



On 3/11/2021 5:26 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Currently devlink health does not give user any clear information
> of what kind of remediation ->recover callback will perform. This
> makes it difficult to understand the impact of enabling auto-
> -remediation, and the severity of the error itself.
> 
> To allow users to make more informed decision add a new remediation
> type attribute.
> 
> Note that we only allow one remediation type per reporter, this
> is intentional. devlink health is not built for mixing issues
> of different severity into one reporter since it only maintains
> one dump, of the first event and a single error counter.
> Nudging vendors towards categorizing issues beyond coarse
> groups is an added bonus.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
>   include/net/devlink.h        |  2 ++
>   include/uapi/linux/devlink.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   net/core/devlink.c           |  7 ++++++-
>   3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
> index b424328af658..72b37769761f 100644
> --- a/include/net/devlink.h
> +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
> @@ -659,6 +659,7 @@ struct devlink_health_reporter;
>   /**
>    * struct devlink_health_reporter_ops - Reporter operations
>    * @name: reporter name
> + * remedy: severity of the remediation required
>    * @recover: callback to recover from reported error
>    *           if priv_ctx is NULL, run a full recover
>    * @dump: callback to dump an object
> @@ -669,6 +670,7 @@ struct devlink_health_reporter;
>   
>   struct devlink_health_reporter_ops {
>   	char *name;
> +	enum devlink_health_remedy remedy;
>   	int (*recover)(struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter,
>   		       void *priv_ctx, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>   	int (*dump)(struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter,
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
> index 41a6ea3b2256..8cd1508b525b 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
> @@ -534,6 +534,9 @@ enum devlink_attr {
>   	DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_STATS,       /* nested */
>   
>   	DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_SF_NUMBER,	/* u32 */
> +
> +	DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_REPORTER_REMEDY,	/* u32 */
> +
>   	/* add new attributes above here, update the policy in devlink.c */
>   
>   	__DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX,
> @@ -620,4 +623,26 @@ enum devlink_health_state {
>   	DL_HEALTH_STATE_ERROR,
>   };
>   
> +/**
> + * enum devlink_health_reporter_remedy - severity of remediation procedure
> + * @DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_NONE: transient error, no remediation required
> + * @DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_KICK: device stalled, processing will be re-triggered
> + * @DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_COMP_RESET: associated device component (e.g. device queue)
> + *			will be reset
> + * @DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_RESET: full device reset, will result in temporary
> + *			unavailability of the device, device configuration
> + *			should not be lost
> + * @DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_REINIT: device will be reinitialized and configuration lost
> + *
> + * Used in %DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_REPORTER_REMEDY, categorizes the health reporter
> + * by the severity of the remediation.
> + */
> +enum devlink_health_remedy {
> +	DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_NONE = 1,

What is the reason zero is skipped?

> +	DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_KICK,
> +	DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_COMP_RESET,
> +	DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_RESET,
> +	DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_REINIT,
> +};
> +
>   #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_DEVLINK_H_ */
> diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
> index 8e4e4bd7bb36..09d77d43ff63 100644
> --- a/net/core/devlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
> @@ -6095,7 +6095,8 @@ __devlink_health_reporter_create(struct devlink *devlink,
>   {
>   	struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter;
>   
> -	if (WARN_ON(graceful_period && !ops->recover))
> +	if (WARN_ON(graceful_period && !ops->recover) ||
> +	    WARN_ON(ops->recover && !ops->remedy))

It allows drivers to set recover callback and report DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_NONE.
Defining DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_NONE = 0  would make this if clause to catch it.

>   		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>   
>   	reporter = kzalloc(sizeof(*reporter), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -6265,6 +6266,10 @@ devlink_nl_health_reporter_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
>   	if (nla_put_string(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_REPORTER_NAME,
>   			   reporter->ops->name))
>   		goto reporter_nest_cancel;
> +	if (reporter->ops->remedy &&
> +	    nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_REPORTER_REMEDY,
> +			reporter->ops->remedy))
> +		goto reporter_nest_cancel;
>   	if (nla_put_u8(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_REPORTER_STATE,
>   		       reporter->health_state))
>   		goto reporter_nest_cancel;
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-11 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-11  3:26 [RFC net-next v2 1/3] devlink: move health state to uAPI Jakub Kicinski
2021-03-11  3:26 ` [RFC net-next v2 2/3] devlink: health: add remediation type Jakub Kicinski
2021-03-11  7:48   ` Jiri Pirko
2021-03-11 14:32   ` Eran Ben Elisha [this message]
2021-03-11 16:45     ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-03-11  3:26 ` [RFC net-next v2 3/3] devlink: add more failure modes Jakub Kicinski
2021-03-11 14:23   ` Eran Ben Elisha
2021-03-11 16:49     ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-03-14 12:33       ` Eran Ben Elisha
2021-03-15 17:06         ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-03-11  7:47 ` [RFC net-next v2 1/3] devlink: move health state to uAPI Jiri Pirko
2021-03-11 16:46   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-03-12 19:56     ` Keller, Jacob E

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53f182d0-e1f6-5e18-ac04-ff7f6ec56af8@nvidia.com \
    --to=eranbe@nvidia.com \
    --cc=andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com \
    --cc=eranbe@mellanox.com \
    --cc=eugenem@fb.com \
    --cc=guglielmo.morandin@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).