From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Duyck Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net-timestamp: Make the clone operation stand-alone from phy timestamping Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:22:27 -0700 Message-ID: <54089FD3.4000309@intel.com> References: <20140904161314.6883.22217.stgit@ahduyck-bv4.jf.intel.com> <20140904162039.6883.39277.stgit@ahduyck-bv4.jf.intel.com> <1409849087.26422.124.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, richardcochran@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, willemb@google.com To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:53476 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754527AbaIDRWk (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:22:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1409849087.26422.124.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/04/2014 09:44 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 12:21 -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote: > >> In addition I have added a destructor named sock_efree which is meant to >> provide a simple way for dropping the reference to skb exceptions that >> aren't part of either the receive or send windows for the socket, and I >> have removed some duplication in spots where this destructor could be used >> in place of sock_edemux. > This is an interesting idea but belongs to a separate patch ? > I suppose I can split it. Expect v4 shortly. Thanks, Alex